<AWT Dev> [9] RFR for 8150724: [TEST] HiDPI: create a test for multiresolution icons
Alexander Stepanov
alexander.v.stepanov at oracle.com
Fri Mar 4 10:15:22 UTC 2016
Hello, Sergey,
We have JLabel(icon) already in the test, and we cannot have both these
cases at the same tab. Moreover, we can in principle use some other
components as an argument of 'setTabComponentAt', but I'm not sure that
these cases have some novelty.
So my suggestion is to can simply return to the old version of the test
(which will fail on OS X) or add it commented with some "TODO: uncomment
/ replace after 8151060 fix" instruction in code.
Thanks,
Alexander
On 3/4/2016 1:21 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> Hi, Alexander.
> I suggest to add these lines to the test instead of replace the old
> lines. The test will pass after the fix for 8151060.
>
> On 03.03.16 17:45, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
>> Could you please review the updated version of the test?
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8150724/webrev.01
>>
>> Line
>> 106 tabbedPane.addTab("", icon, p);
>> was replaced with
>> 109 tabbedPane.addTab("", p);
>> 110 tabbedPane.setTabComponentAt(0, new JLabel(icon));
>>
>> - in such a case the test passes for OS X (as well as for Windows,
>> Linux).
>> Probably these changes should be reverted after JDK-8151060 fix.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alexander
>>
>> On 3/2/2016 7:15 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
>>> Hello Sergey,
>>>
>>> It fails because of
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151060
>>>
>>> (plus we need here some tricky check for resolution by the analogy
>>> with 8150258 because of JDK-8150844).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alexander
>>>
>>> On 2/26/2016 4:25 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>>>> Hi, Alexander.
>>>> The test failed on osx 10.11 + retina. Is it expected?
>>>>
>>>> On 26.02.16 15:53, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you please review the following fix
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8150724/webrev.00/
>>>>> for
>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150724 ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Just a single test added.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Alexander
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
More information about the awt-dev
mailing list