tracking JDK7
Lussier, Denis
denisl at openscg.com
Fri Oct 22 10:27:20 PDT 2010
I too have had great luck using the old Soylatte build of OpenJDK 6. I
understand that this can nicely be used as a bootstrap build for OpenJDK7.
What I'm wondering is if anyone is willing (and capable) of getting it so
that a miore current OpenJDK 6 can be built as a 32-bit Universal OSX binary
so that Apple can't continue to punish owners of (perfectly good) older Macs
by denying them access to JDK6.
--Luss
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Sam Pullara <spullara at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm hoping that now that Apple has officially decided to no longer maintain
> the JVM that the community takes over. I've had good luck building it from
> time to time using soylatte-1.0.3-32 as the base build JVM.
>
> Sam
>
> On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Lussier, Denis wrote:
>
> I'm curious if anyone (besides myself) might be interested in helping to
> bring up to current the OpenJDK6 OSX work.
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:35 AM, John Rose <john.r.rose at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> I see that the BSD port has been integrated with b105 since 8/14.
>>
>> Meanwhile, JDK7 has now advanced to b115.
>>
>> Is there a problem holding up the integration of the new JDK7 changes?
>>
>> (Is there a project status page where I should be looking? The wiki looks
>> too quiet.)
>>
>> -- John
>>
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/bsd-port-dev/attachments/20101022/14d551b5/attachment.html
More information about the bsd-port-dev
mailing list