Using the no-charge "Express" tools to build a JDK on win32 [RE: Upcoming OpenJDK infrastructure projects]

[Ted Neward]

Al of the SDKs (collectively known as the "Platform SDK") have windows.h in
them--that didn't sound like the problem from Tim's email. "<atlmfc.h>" is
not part of the SDK, it's part of ATL or MFC, I'm not sure which offhand,
and neither is considered part of the SDK, AFAIK.

Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: build-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:build-dev-
> bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 7:34 AM
> To: Tim.Bell at Sun.COM
> Cc: build-dev
> Subject: Re: Using the no-charge "Express" tools to build a JDK on
> win32 [RE: Upcoming OpenJDK infrastructure projects]
> 
> Tim Bell skrev  den 31-12-2007 21:42:
> >
> > Other developers may have reported better success, but after reading
> > over the archives I believe they were using 1) the fully paid-for
> > Visual C++ 2005 kit, or 2) a paid-for SDK that was already on their
> > system.  If I am mistaken here, please follow up with specific
> details
> > of your build platform and how I (or we) could reproduce the results.
> You may get better results with the Microsoft ® Windows Server® 2003 R2
> Platform SDK available from
> 
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=0BAF2B35-C656-
> 4969-ACE8-E4C0C0716ADB
> 
> I vaguely remember from last time we looked at this that this at least
> knew about windows.h
> 
> --
>   Thorbjørn
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1205 - Release Date:
> 12/31/2007 3:32 PM
> 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1205 - Release Date: 12/31/2007
3:32 PM