FW: ATL headers and libraries?
Kelly O'Hair
Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM
Thu May 15 17:15:25 UTC 2008
Tim's email: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2007-December/000654.html
Mentions this:
hotspot\src\os\windows\vm\jvm_windows.h(33) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'windows.h': No such file
or directory
But windows.h should not be a problem to find, right? Platform SDK should
have one I assume.
I seriously doubt that Hotspot would have any dependence on atlmfc.
I searched and found no include's of any obvious atl files.
-kto
Ted Neward wrote:
> My understanding was that it did--there are a few build-dev emails about
> missing "atlmfc.h" just a few weeks ago....
>
> But I haven't verified that from looking at the sources yet--been busy with
> other things. I'll take a look and see. Can you check with the Hotspot team
> if they know of any in the meantime (or, perhaps better yet, can you suggest
> which list would be best to forward this email to)?
>
> Ted Neward
> Java, .NET, XML Services
> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
> http://www.tedneward.com
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM [mailto:Kelly.Ohair at Sun.COM]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:24 AM
>> To: Ted Neward
>> Cc: build-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: FW: ATL headers and libraries?
>>
>> Does the hotspot sources have a ATL/MFC dependence?
>>
>> -kto
>>
>>
>> Ted Neward wrote:
>>> Kelly, et al—
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Should we just wait with the attempted port until this (see below)
>>> happens? Or do we want to try and actively remove the dependencies on
>>> ATL/MFC from the Hotspot code?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ted Neward
>>>
>>> Java, .NET, XML Services
>>>
>>> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
>>>
>>> http://www.tedneward.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Herb Sutter [mailto:hsutter at microsoft.com]
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:08 AM
>>> *To:* Ted Neward
>>> *Subject:* RE: ATL headers and libraries?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, no, there is no way to get to ATL and/or MFC without
>>> buying VS Std/Pro/etc. (of course, you can get those through your
>> MSDN
>>> subscription, etc.)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> For the future, though, the plan is to ship both ATL and MFC (x86, I
>>> believe) in VC++ Express at some point.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Herb
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Ted Neward [mailto:ted at tedneward.com]
>>> *Sent:* Monday, May 12, 2008 12:23 PM
>>> *To:* Herb Sutter
>>> *Subject:* ATL headers and libraries?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you tell me (or put me in touch with somebody who can) if it’s
>>> possible to get a hold of the ATL and/or MFC headers and libraries
>>> without buying Visual Studio Standard/Professional/Enterprise/etc? I
>>> have a client who’s looking to see if they can use just VC++ Express
>> to
>>> maintain some code that uses ATL and MFC.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ted Neward
>>>
>>> Java, .NET, XML Services
>>>
>>> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
>>>
>>> http://www.tedneward.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>> Checked by AVG.
>>> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.15/1426 - Release Date:
>>> 5/10/2008 11:12 AM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG.
>>> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.15/1426 - Release Date:
>>> 5/10/2008 11:12 AM
>>>
>>>
>>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>> Checked by AVG.
>>> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1430 - Release Date:
>>> 5/13/2008 7:31 AM
>>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG.
>> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1430 - Release Date:
>> 5/13/2008 7:31 AM
>>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1434 - Release Date: 5/15/2008
> 7:24 AM
>
>
More information about the build-dev
mailing list