Fwd: hg: jdk7/build/langtools: 6829575: 100028: Debug information is incomplete or missing

[Kelly O'Hair]

My fault. I reviewed this and it didn't dawn on me what this did
until your email.

Yes, the default production builds with javac should be source,lines.
Sorry, I had native code on the brain and was thinking 'debug off' :^(

-kto

Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> It's one thing to be enabling more debug information if you set flags, 
> and/or making it more consistent, but I'm not happy with you removing 
> debug information by default.  At least from reading the changeset diff, 
> it seems there is no way to get what was previously the default amount 
> of debug info, which is source,lines (but not vars).
> 
> Source and lines are good to get useful stack traces in the face of 
> exceptions, even if var information is not present.  var information is 
> typically not required in product builds.
> 
> -- Jon
> 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> *From: *aph at redhat.com <mailto:aph at redhat.com>
>> *Date: *April 17, 2009 8:15:39 AM PDT
>> *To: *jdk7-changes at openjdk.java.net 
>> <mailto:jdk7-changes at openjdk.java.net>, build-dev at openjdk.java.net 
>> <mailto:build-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>> *Subject: **hg: jdk7/build/langtools: 6829575: 100028: Debug 
>> information is incomplete or missing*
>>
>> Changeset: 4b72c2556789
>> Author:    aph
>> Date:      2009-04-17 15:56 +0100
>> URL: 
>>       http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/langtools/rev/4b72c2556789
>>
>> 6829575: 100028: Debug information is incomplete or missing
>> Summary: Enable debugging in many places
>> Reviewed-by: ohair
>> Contributed-by: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com <mailto:aph at redhat.com>>
>>
>> ! make/Makefile
>>
>