Need reviewers - jdk testing changes 6888927

[Alan Bateman]

Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> :
> It was more of a balancing act on the test groupings with regards to 
> timings
> etc., and imageio did have "io" in it's name :^), and most of them ran 
> safely
> in samevm mode. So we can move them to any other group that is run in 
> samevm
> mode.  Do you have a better match than jdk_io?
It's probably best to group the image I/O tests with other tests in the 
client area. So far I see you've got jdk_awt and jdk_swing. Would the 
timing lean themselves to adding a new target or adding to one of the 
existing targets? If reducing the test list for jdk_io causes some 
unbalance then you could add to it the test list from jdk_nio1 (the 
java/nio/file tests) - they are in good shape and run quickly.

-Alan.