JDK8 32-bit "docs" build fails on 64-bit Windows
Ulf Zibis
Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de
Sat Oct 29 19:41:22 UTC 2011
Hi,
I still don't understand, why you can't use the OS_ARCH information from the new "release" file. See:
- 6989472 <http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6472931> - Provide simple jdk
identification information in the install image
-
http://markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Anet.java.openjdk#query:list%3Anet.java.openjdk.build-dev%20from%3A%22Ulf%20Zibis%22+page:2+mid:al5nss7e5lh676me+state:results
- http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.build.devel/3603/focus=3757
- http://www.mail-archive.com/build-dev@openjdk.java.net/msg03706.html
-Ulf
Am 28.10.2011 19:22, schrieb Volker Simonis:
> I think 'file' is a good idea because we're in a Cygwin bash anyway.
>
> The output for 64 and 32 bit executables is:
>
> PE32+ executable (console) x86-64, for MS Windows
> PE32 executable (console) Intel 80386, for MS Windows
>
> That should be easy enough to parse.
> I'll be on holiday and on the EclipsCon next week but after that I can
> submit a patch if you want.
> On the other side I'll be not offended if you fix it:)
>
> Regards,
> Volker
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/attachments/20111029/2eb2bb7b/attachment.htm>
More information about the build-dev
mailing list