JDK8 32-bit "docs" build fails on 64-bit Windows

[Ulf Zibis]

Am 29.10.2011 21:41, schrieb Ulf Zibis:
> Hi,
>
> I still don't understand, why you can't use the OS_ARCH information from the new "release" file. See:
> - 6989472 <http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6472931> - Provide simple jdk 
> identification information in the install image
> - 
> http://markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Anet.java.openjdk#query:list%3Anet.java.openjdk.build-dev%20from%3A%22Ulf%20Zibis%22+page:2+mid:al5nss7e5lh676me+state:results
> - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.build.devel/3603/focus=3757
> - http://www.mail-archive.com/build-dev@openjdk.java.net/msg03706.html
>
> -Ulf

Oops, wrong ID behind link, correction:
- 6989472 <http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6989472> - Provide simple jdk 
identification information in the install image

-Ulf

>
>
> Am 28.10.2011 19:22, schrieb Volker Simonis:
>> I think 'file' is a good idea because we're in a Cygwin bash anyway.
>>
>> The output for 64 and 32 bit executables is:
>>
>> PE32+ executable (console) x86-64, for MS Windows
>> PE32 executable (console) Intel 80386, for MS Windows
>>
>> That should be easy enough to parse.
>> I'll be on holiday and on the EclipsCon next week but after that I can
>> submit a patch if you want.
>> On the other side I'll be not offended if you fix it:)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Volker
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/attachments/20111030/d94b31c3/attachment.htm>