8032443: ,Java Access Bridge version strings need to be fixed
Magnus Ihse Bursie
magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com
Wed Feb 19 09:55:14 UTC 2014
On 2014-02-18 05:22, Pete Brunet wrote:
> Please review this change:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8032443/webrev.00/
>
> for this bug:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032443
>
> Some resource compiler defines are need so the JAB DLLs Properties sheet
> will have the proper information. This change fixes the names that are
> displayed.
Pete,
Even though I don't know how these RC flags are interpreted, I notice
that virtually all other libraries that has a JDK_FNAME and
JDK_INTERNAL_NAME also has a JDK_FTYPE=0x2L.
(In fact, generalizing the pattern
RC_FLAGS := $(RC_FLAGS) \
-D "JDK_FNAME=FOO.dll" \
-D "JDK_INTERNAL_NAME=FOO" \
-D "JDK_FTYPE=0x2L",
that appear all over the place is something that has been on our agenda,
unfortunately for far too long without happening).
It seems that there need to be a good reason for these libraries to not
match this pattern.
/Magnus
More information about the build-dev
mailing list