RFR: Allow using a system-installed lcms2

[Omair Majid]

* Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> [2014-02-21 10:36]:
> > I think the "j2" convention is reasonable.
> 
> This is where we disagree. I may have agreed if this was new, but we've been
> using libjavalcms.so for the lifetime of 7 and I see no reason to change this.
> 
> Also, "j2" seems pretty meaningless.

I had the same thoughts at first. But I asked this same question [1] and
was informed that the 'j2' is for "java to" [2]. So this is the "java to
lcms" bridge.

Thanks,
Omair

[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2013-December/011274.html
[2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2013-December/011325.html  

-- 
PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95  0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681