Review Request: 8074428, 8074429, 8074430 jdk.pack200, jdk.jartool, jdk.policytool modules

[Kumar Srinivasan]

The changes look ok to me, however I am wondering if the module
could be called jdk.unpack200 and not jdk.pack200 ? since it
contains only the unpacker, and the bin utilities are pack200 and
unpack200.

Kumar

On 3/4/2015 5:13 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
> As listed in an open issue in JEP 200:
>
> The jdk.dev and jdk.runtime modules contain miscellaneous tools that do
> not obviously belong to any other module; these modules will eventually
> be either renamed or refactored.
>
> Currently there are jdk.javadoc, jdk.jconsole, jdk.jcmd modules in
> the JDK that are organized around its primary tool.  Such organization
> is easy to name, document and understand. This patch proposes to
> move tools from jdk.runtime and jdk.dev to jdk.pack200, jdk.jartool,
> jdk.policytool modules.
>
> Overall Webrev that will be convenient to review the build change
> and modules.xml change.
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8074428%2b8074429%2b8074430/webrev.00/
>
> Separate webrevs for each issue:
> 1. pack200, unpack200 to jdk.pack200
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8074428%2b8074429%2b8074430/8074428/webrev.00/ 
>
>
> 2. jar, jarsigner to jdk.jartool
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8074428%2b8074429%2b8074430/8074429/webrev.00/ 
>
>
> 3. policytool to jdk.policytool
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8074428%2b8074429%2b8074430/8074430/webrev.00/ 
>
>
> There are remaining tools in jdk.dev that will be handled separately.
> jdk.dev will disappear when all of the remaining tools find its home.
>
> Mandy
>