RFR: 8194493 test for release file checking needs to be tier1

[Randy Crihfield]

This isn't a core lib test, or a vm test, or an install test, or any 
other subcomponent.

When someone builds the OpenJDK, they need to know right off if they 
actually built the OpenJDK w/o including the closed bits.
If this test fails, then there's no point in running any other test.  It 
is actually a build test.

Now, if you believe the test group entry should be located in a special 
build test place that I didn't see, that's fine.
If there is no build test location, then perhaps there SHOULD be if this 
is not sufficient.

Because of its nature to determine if the build is even worth testing, I 
made it a tier1.

Randy

On 01/ 3/18 07:58 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> The build team don't have anything to do with TEST.groups, this should 
> be reviewed on core-libs-dev.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On 4/01/2018 2:26 AM, Randy Crihfield wrote:
>> I need to add the negative test created for JDK-8192837 to the 
>> TEST.groups file.
>>
>> The related bug is https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194493
>>
>> The diff is very short and included below.
>>
>> Any comments/suggestions are welcome, also I will need a sponsor for 
>> it at the end…
>>
>> Randy
>>
>>
>> randyc at pollux -> hg diff TEST.groups
>> diff -r 3a52333a5e57 test/jdk/TEST.groups
>> --- a/test/jdk/TEST.groups
>> +++ b/test/jdk/TEST.groups
>> @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@
>>       java/nio/Buffer \
>>       com/sun/crypto/provider/Cipher \
>>       :jdk_math \
>> -    tools/pack200
>> +    tools/pack200 \
>> +    :build_sanity
>>
>>   tier2 = \
>>       :jdk_io \
>> @@ -60,6 +61,10 @@
>>   # Other test definitions; generally smaller granularity than tiers
>>   #
>>
>> +# Build source checking
>> +build_sanity = \
>> +    sanity/releaseFile
>> +
>>   # java.lang package and VM runtime support
>>   jdk_lang = \
>>       java/lang \
>> randyc at pollux ->