RFR (S): 8241947: Minor comment fixes for system property handling

Magnus Ihse Bursie magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com
Tue Mar 31 15:32:53 UTC 2020


 From a build perspective this looks fine.

But it seems you are changing the interface for java.lang.System. Don't 
you need a CSR for that? Or is your claim that the interface was indeed 
changed by JDK-8197927, and it is a bug that the documentation was not 
updated to match this?

/Magnus

On 2020-03-31 16:56, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please review a small fix that updates two comments.
>
> The first one, in make/autoconf/spec.gmk.in, is probably quite old. It talks about handling of a property "vm.vendor" in VersionProps.java.template. However, there is no property "vm.vendor", it must rather be "java.vendor". I stumbled over that when looking at the change of JDK-4947890 (Minimize JNI upcalls in system-properties initialization).
>
> The second one is the code comment attached to "private static Properties props;" in java.lang.System. After JDK-8197927 (Allow the system property `java.vendor.version` to be undefined), "java.vendor.version" can be undefined, so this should be reflected in the comment. I also took the liberty to remove an unneeded import statement.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241947
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8241947.0/
>
> Thanks
> Christoph
>




More information about the build-dev mailing list