pre-submit tests for github PRs
Langer, Christoph
christoph.langer at sap.com
Mon May 23 15:18:18 UTC 2022
Hi,
that's because the PR is a based on a pre-loom version of master.
Best regards
Christoph
> -----Original Message-----
> From: build-dev <build-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of Philip Race
> Sent: Montag, 23. Mai 2022 17:14
> To: Aleksey Shipilev <shade at redhat.com>; Ioi Lam <ioi.lam at oracle.com>;
> build-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: pre-submit tests for github PRs
>
> BTW I am wondering whether I should believe this explanation since it does
> pass sometimes,
>
> eg :
>
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8820
>
> How is that possible ?
>
> -phil
>
> On 5/23/22 8:05 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> > On 5/23/22 16:53, Ioi Lam wrote:
> >> On 5/23/2022 4:41 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> >>> On 22/05/2022 23:58, David Holmes wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> GHA tests a range of OpenJDK ports, not just the "mainstream
> >>>> platforms".
> >>>>
> >>>> The existing linux-86 failures (and others) are due to the Loom
> >>>> integration which only fully supports a couple of platforms and
> >>>> which broke all the other ports upon initial integration. Some
> >>>> folks in the community have been working through things to fix that.
> >>>
> >>> GHA is configured to cross build for most of these
> >>> ports/configurations and they should pass. Running them is another
> >>> matter of course. GHA does run some tests on linux-x86 and the
> >>> x86_32 port does need work before it can run the tests with --enable-
> preview.
> >>> Aleksey Shipilëv seems to be making good progress on it.
> >>>
> >>> -Alan
> >>
> >> Maybe it makes sense to disable the x86 GHA runs before the
> >> underlying issue is fixed? There's too much noise.
> >
> > There is a slightly better way to do it:
> > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8843
> >
More information about the build-dev
mailing list