pre-submit tests for github PRs

[Philip Race]

Ah.

-phil

On 5/23/22 8:18 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> Hi,
>
> that's because the PR is a based on a pre-loom version of master.
>
> Best regards
> Christoph
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: build-dev <build-dev-retn at openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of Philip Race
>> Sent: Montag, 23. Mai 2022 17:14
>> To: Aleksey Shipilev <shade at redhat.com>; Ioi Lam <ioi.lam at oracle.com>;
>> build-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: pre-submit tests for github PRs
>>
>> BTW I am wondering whether I should believe this explanation since it does
>> pass sometimes,
>>
>> eg :
>>
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8820
>>
>> How is that possible ?
>>
>> -phil
>>
>> On 5/23/22 8:05 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>> On 5/23/22 16:53, Ioi Lam wrote:
>>>> On 5/23/2022 4:41 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>>>> On 22/05/2022 23:58, David Holmes wrote:
>>>>>> GHA tests a range of OpenJDK ports, not just the "mainstream
>>>>>> platforms".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The existing linux-86 failures (and others) are due to the Loom
>>>>>> integration which only fully supports a couple of platforms and
>>>>>> which broke all the other ports upon initial integration. Some
>>>>>> folks in the community have been working through things to fix that.
>>>>> GHA is configured to cross build for most of these
>>>>> ports/configurations and they should pass. Running them is another
>>>>> matter of course. GHA does run some tests on linux-x86 and the
>>>>> x86_32 port does need work before it can run the tests with --enable-
>> preview.
>>>>> Aleksey Shipilëv seems to be making good progress on it.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Alan
>>>> Maybe it makes sense to disable the x86 GHA runs before the
>>>> underlying issue is fixed? There's too much noise.
>>> There is a slightly better way to do it:
>>>    https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8843
>>>