RFR: 8366777: Build fails unknown pseudo-op with old AS on linux-aarch64 [v18]

[SendaoYan]

On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 16:30:09 GMT, Erik Joelsson <erikj at openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> You are not supposed to both provide AVAILABLE and CHECK_AVAILABLE. Also, if you do setup CHECK_AVAILABLE you should always provide a value to the AVAILABLE variable; now you don't have an else clause for the cpu and toolchain tests. Also, CHECK_AVAILABLE was designed for small and simple tests; this is so long it becames hard to read.
>>> 
>>> Instead I suggest the following: Start by setting AARCH64_SVE_AVAILABLE to false. Then do the code that is currently in the CHECK_AVAILABLE block, but replace the assignment to AVAILABLE with an assignment to AARCH64_SVE_AVAILABLE. (Where it is true, since you defaulted it to false you can skip that line).
>>> 
>>> Then, finally, you can do like this:
>>> 
>>> ```
>>>  UTIL_ARG_ENABLE(NAME: aarch64-sve, DEFAULT: auto,
>>>     RESULT: AARCH64_SVE_ENABLED,
>>>     DESC: [Use SVE when compiling libsleef],
>>>     AVAILABLE: $AARCH64_SVE_AVAILABLE)
>>> ```
>> 
>> Here is the code evaluating AVAILABLE:
>> 
>> 
>>   # Check if the option is available
>>   AVAILABLE=ARG_AVAILABLE
>>   # Run the available check block (if any), which can overwrite AVAILABLE.
>>   ARG_CHECK_AVAILABLE
>> 
>> Which is why I interpreted it as ok to supply both AVAILABLE as a default and AVAILABLE_CHECK.
>> 
>> Also I don't agree that this is too big to be inline. I think it's perfectly readable.
>
> The issue with using the AVAILABLE variable in `AC_MSG_RESULT` is that it has the values true/false not yes/no, which is the common output for results of configure tests.

Thanks. CHECK_AVAILABLE has been removed from UTIL_ARG_ENABLE, I think this will make the usage of UTIL_ARG_ENABLE looks more consistent with other makefiles.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27073#discussion_r2347321246