java-rmi.exe/cgi
Robert Ottenhag
robert.ottenhag at oracle.com
Thu Nov 10 08:34:32 PST 2011
Erik,
Ok, I'm good with that.
/R
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Joelsson
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 5:24 PM
> To: Robert Ottenhag
> Cc: Kelly O'Hair; build-infra-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: java-rmi.exe/cgi
>
> You have a good point there, Robert. Since I already did the
> conversion,
> I'm now just tweaking it so that the converted makefile does the same
> weird thing as the original.
>
> /Erik
>
> On 2011-11-10 17:21, Robert Ottenhag wrote:
> > This bug is mine actually. I submitted it to Sun back when
> analyzing
> > the JDK 6 build system for the JRockit JDK 6 port.
> >
> > My personal recommendation is that the removal should be
> done in Open
> > JDK 8 (and 7uX), and that the build-infra project should
> not remove it
> > on it's own, especially since the build-infra project does
> not do bug
> > tracking.
> >
> > I will take ownership of that bug and get it fixed.
> >
> > /Robert
> >
> >
> > On 11/10/2011 05:09 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> >> What I don't understand is, when java-rmi.cgi was removed
> java 1.2,
> >> why leave the source and build file for it? They just stopped
> >> bundling it in the images?
> >>
> >> /Erik
> >>
> >> On 2011-11-10 16:46, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >>> Actually,, I suspect we may have many of these CCC type
> issues, we
> >>> could just gather them up and
> >>> do one CCC, when we get closer to integrating the changes.
> >>> So I still vote for delete, but we need to track these things.
> >>>
> >>> -kto
> >>>
> >>> On Nov 10, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> You have my vote too.
> >>>>
> >>>> However, if we are removing something, we will eventually need a
> >>>> bug report and file a CCC for it (http://ccc.us.oracle.com)
> >>>> CCC is used whenever we do anything to the product that
> a customer
> >>>> might be surprised by, like deleting files or
> >>>> removing apis etc.
> >>>>
> >>>> Of course CCC might go away when the Sun LDAP goes away, not
> >>>> sure... We could wait to see what happens to CCC. ;^)
> >>>>
> >>>> -kto
> >>>>
> >>>> On Nov 10, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Ah, thanks! The bug evaluation says that this shouldn't
> be built
> >>>>> at all. For the sake of faster builds, not building unnecessary
> >>>>> stuff is the best way of improving speed. I vote for delete.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /Erik
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2011-11-10 16:21, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >>>>>> See http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6512052
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My gut feeling is that we fix it, and then add this file to an
> >>>>>> exclusion list when we get to the point of
> >>>>>> comparing built jdk images.
> >>>>>> But I'm willing to accept other suggestions.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -kto
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Nov 10, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sometimes when converting makefiles in the jdk repo,
> I stumble
> >>>>>>> over things that don't look right. The code seem to
> suggest one
> >>>>>>> intention, but careful inspection reveals a different
> behavior.
> >>>>>>> Normally I try to copy the actual behavior and put a
> note in the
> >>>>>>> new make file about it. Now I discovered something
> that's just
> >>>>>>> too weird:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In "jdk/make/sun/rmi/cgi/Makefile" the program
> "java-rmi.exe" is
> >>>>>>> built. This looks like it's intended to be a windows native
> >>>>>>> version of the "java-rmi.cgi" script that is
> available on linux
> >>>>>>> and solaris. The makefile even copies java-rmi.exe to
> >>>>>>> java-rmi.cgi. When creating the j2sdk/jre images,
> however, only
> >>>>>>> the exe version is included. I verified this in the promoted
> >>>>>>> builds of jdk 7 (b148 and a few others). The makefile
> also tries
> >>>>>>> to declare that the program be compiled from
> >>>>>>> "jdk/src/windows/bin/java-rmi.c" (by declaring
> FILES_c variable)
> >>>>>>> but Program.gmk ignores this and just builds main.c (the
> >>>>>>> standard java launcher) instead. So the "java-rmi.exe" in a
> >>>>>>> windows distribution is just java.exe with a weird name.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What is this script/program used for, is it used at
> all, and how
> >>>>>>> should I convert the building of it? I have tried compiling
> >>>>>>> java-rmi.c and it seems to be working at least. (Gives same
> >>>>>>> default output as the script on linux)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> /Erik
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the build-infra-dev
mailing list