java-rmi.exe/cgi

[Kelly O'Hair]

On Nov 10, 2011, at 11:21 AM, Robert Ottenhag wrote:

> This bug is mine actually. I submitted it to Sun back when analyzing the JDK 6 build system for the JRockit JDK 6 port.
> 
> My personal recommendation is that the removal should be done in Open JDK 8 (and 7uX), and that the build-infra project should not remove it on it's own, especially since the build-infra project does not do bug tracking.
> 
> I will take ownership of that bug and get it fixed.

Thank you.

-kto

> 
> /Robert
> 
> 
> On 11/10/2011 05:09 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> What I don't understand is, when java-rmi.cgi was removed java 1.2, why leave the source and build file for it? They just stopped bundling it in the images?
>> 
>> /Erik
>> 
>> On 2011-11-10 16:46, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>> Actually,, I suspect we may have many of these CCC type issues, we could just gather them up and
>>> do one CCC, when we get closer to integrating the changes.
>>> So I still vote for delete, but we need to track these things.
>>> 
>>> -kto
>>> 
>>> On Nov 10, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>> 
>>>> You have my vote too.
>>>> 
>>>> However, if we are removing something, we will eventually need a bug report and file a CCC for it (http://ccc.us.oracle.com)
>>>> CCC is used whenever we do anything to the product that a customer might be surprised by, like deleting files or
>>>> removing apis etc.
>>>> 
>>>> Of course CCC might go away when the Sun LDAP goes away, not sure...  We could wait to see what happens to CCC. ;^)
>>>> 
>>>> -kto
>>>> 
>>>> On Nov 10, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Ah, thanks! The bug evaluation says that this shouldn't be built at all. For the sake of faster builds, not building unnecessary stuff is the best way of improving speed. I vote for delete.
>>>>> 
>>>>> /Erik
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2011-11-10 16:21, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>>>>> See http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6512052
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My gut feeling is that we fix it, and then add this file to an exclusion list when we get to the point of
>>>>>> comparing built jdk images.
>>>>>> But I'm willing to accept other suggestions.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -kto
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Nov 10, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sometimes when converting makefiles in the jdk repo, I stumble over things that don't look right. The code seem to suggest one intention, but careful inspection reveals a different behavior. Normally I try to copy the actual behavior and put a note in the new make file about it. Now I discovered something that's just too weird:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In "jdk/make/sun/rmi/cgi/Makefile" the program "java-rmi.exe" is built. This looks like it's intended to be a windows native version of the "java-rmi.cgi" script that is available on linux and solaris. The makefile even copies java-rmi.exe to java-rmi.cgi. When creating the j2sdk/jre images, however, only the exe version is included. I verified this in the promoted builds of jdk 7 (b148 and a few others). The makefile also tries to declare that the program be compiled from "jdk/src/windows/bin/java-rmi.c" (by declaring FILES_c variable) but Program.gmk ignores this and just builds main.c (the standard java launcher) instead. So the "java-rmi.exe" in a windows distribution is just java.exe with a weird name.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What is this script/program used for, is it used at all, and how should I convert the building of it? I have tried compiling java-rmi.c and it seems to be working at least. (Gives same default output as the script on linux)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> /Erik
> 
> 
> -- 
> Oracle
> Robert Ottenhag | Senior Member of Technical Staff
> Phone: +46850630961 | Fax: +46850630911 | Mobile: +46707106161
> Oracle Java HotSpot Virtual Machine
> ORACLE Sweden | Folkungagatan 122 | SE-116 30 Stockholm
> 
> Oracle Svenska AB, Kronborgsgränd 17, S-164 28 KISTA, reg.no. 556254-6746
> 
> Green Oracle
> 
> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment
> --
>