RFR: 8081474: SwingWorker calls 'done' before the 'doInBackground' is finished [v19]

Alexey Ivanov aivanov at openjdk.org
Tue Feb 14 12:05:56 UTC 2023


On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 16:46:24 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <psadhukhan at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> SwingWorker done() method [spec ](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/SwingWorker.java#L452) says "Executed on the Event Dispatch Thread after the doInBackground method is finished"
>> but there's no mechanism in place to honor that claim.
>> The [spec](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/SwingWorker.java#L289)
>> also says the state should be DONE after doInBackground() returns which is also not done.
>> 
>> Modified the code to honour the specification.
>
> Prasanta Sadhukhan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Test alignment

Should `evt.getNewValue()` be used to identify the new value of the state property?

The test does not fail if I change the order of the lines in the `finally` block that reverses the order in which the `done` method is called and listeners are notified. I expected it to fail. Isn't it the reason why `PropertyChangeListener` was added?

test/jdk/javax/swing/SwingWorker/TestDoneBeforeDoInBackground.java line 103:

> 101:                               "PropertyChangeListeners called with " +
> 102:                                "state STARTED before doInBackground is finished");
> 103:                     }

The comments, conditions and error messages do not match.

In the first case, it should be `doInBackgroundStarted` instead of `doInBackgroundFinished`; in the second — `doInBackgroundFinished` correspondingly.

Or the error messages should be swapped.

Did you mean anything else?

-------------

Changes requested by aivanov (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11940



More information about the client-libs-dev mailing list