RFR: 8342782: AWTEventMulticaster throws StackOverflowError using AquaButtonUI [v5]

[Tejesh R]

On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:34:46 GMT, Jeremy <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The AWTEventMulticaster is a tree node with 2 children. This PR proposes rebalancing that tree after 500 additions to avoid potential StackOverflowErrors when trying to interact with a large AWTEventMulticaster.
>> 
>> In the original headful test:
>> We added 8,000 checkboxes, and when their parent panel was hidden the stack needed to grow to 24,000 lines. It took 8,000 lines to recursively call `java.awt.AWTEventMulticaster.componentHidden`, and then 16,000 additional lines to call two recursive methods to remove a listener:
>> 
>> java.desktop/java.awt.AWTEventMulticaster.removeInternal()
>> java.desktop/java.awt.AWTEventMulticaster.remove()
>> 
>> 
>> With this current PR the max stack size reaches 1,267 instead. (If we rebalanced at EVERY addition, then that same scenario would reach a max stack size of 71.)
>> 
>> JDK-8342782 included a headful test case, but I think the main problem it demonstrated can be represented by the headless test case attached to this PR.
>> 
>> Depending on how this PR is received I may submit a separate ticket & PR to modify AquaButtonUI so it doesn't always attach an AncestorListener. (That is: if my GUI includes 8,000 checkboxes then I don't need 8,000 AncestorListeners.) But JDK-8342782's test case is currently written in a way that should reproduce across all L&F's, so that can be discussed separately.
>
> Jeremy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   8342782: expanding wildcard imports
>   
>   This is in response to:
>   https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21962#discussion_r1857389973

src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/AWTEventMulticaster.java line 1020:

> 1018:             return new AWTEventMulticaster(array[index0], array[index1]);
> 1019:         }
> 1020:         int mid = (index0 + index1)/2;

Suggestion:

        int mid = (index0 + index1) / 2;

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21962#discussion_r1871376542