Closures for Java (0.6) specification part b
Neal Gafter
neal at gafter.com
Tue Dec 15 19:21:54 PST 2009
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Mark Mahieu <markmahieu at googlemail.com>wrote:
> Bit of a long shot this, but is there any value in revisiting the old idea
> of using a different syntax for yielding a value from a lambda?
>
That doesn't work out so well, for reasons discussed in gory detail here: <
http://gafter.blogspot.com/2006/08/tennents-correspondence-principle-and.html
>.
Cheers,
Neal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/closures-dev/attachments/20091215/bc966440/attachment.html
More information about the closures-dev
mailing list