Closures for Java (0.6) specification part b

[Mark Mahieu]

On 16 Dec 2009, at 03:21, Neal Gafter wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Mark Mahieu <markmahieu at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Bit of a long shot this, but is there any value in revisiting the old idea of using a different syntax for yielding a value from a lambda?
> 
> That doesn't work out so well, for reasons discussed in gory detail here: <http://gafter.blogspot.com/2006/08/tennents-correspondence-principle-and.html>.
> 
> Cheers,
> Neal 
> 

OK, although I must admit I'm struggling to see how it doesn't also apply to the use of 'return' in statement lambdas.

Mark

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/closures-dev/attachments/20091216/c68a930d/attachment-0001.html