Better jcov integration
eric at metricspace.net
Thu Mar 1 01:41:48 UTC 2018
Definitely worth considering.
If you have source repositories for those plugins, it could probably
help me figure out the documentation-generation issue that I have.
On 02/28/2018 08:13, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> If it can’t be accepted as an net.openjdk project then we could host it
> at AdoptOpenJDK (we already have some OpenJDK related Maven plugins
> there for example).
> I’ll let Jonathan et al comment on the rest.
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 at 12:43, Eric McCorkle <eric at metricspace.net
> <mailto:eric at metricspace.net>> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I recently found myself needing better integration of jcov into various
> build/testing tools, so I did two things. First, I modified the jcov
> tool to generate a report in the Cobertura XML format, which is used by
> Jenkins and other tools as an input format. While these reports are
> inferior in my opinion to the HTML reports jcov generates, they do allow
> integration with other tools and CI systems. Therefore, I think
> providing this functionality would likely encourage more people to use
> jcov over the alternatives.
> I've attached the patch for this modification here, if anyone would like
> to review it.
> I've also mostly wrangled the Maven plugin API to create a plugin for
> using jcov in a Maven project (however, there is one remaining issue
> with documentation generation that I need to correct before I call the
> plugin "finished"). I'm not sure if that would be something that would
> be added to codetools, if the group ID should be something like
> "org.openjdk", or what else ought to be done about it. I will gladly
> contribute the code if there's a desire to adopt it.
> Cheers, Martijn (Sent from Gmail Mobile)
More information about the code-tools-dev