Better jcov integration

[Martijn Verburg]

Hi Eric,

What's your GitHub user id?  I'll add you to the AdoptOpenJDK org and you
can take a look.  I think the maven jdeps plugin is there as well as a new
jsplitpkgscan tool we're working on.

Cheers,
Martijn

On 1 March 2018 at 01:41, Eric McCorkle <eric at metricspace.net> wrote:

> Definitely worth considering.
>
> If you have source repositories for those plugins, it could probably
> help me figure out the documentation-generation issue that I have.
>
> On 02/28/2018 08:13, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > If it can’t be accepted as an net.openjdk project then we could host it
> > at AdoptOpenJDK (we already have some OpenJDK related Maven plugins
> > there for example).
> >
> > I’ll let Jonathan et al comment on the rest.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Martijn
> >
> > On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 at 12:43, Eric McCorkle <eric at metricspace.net
> > <mailto:eric at metricspace.net>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hello everyone,
> >
> >     I recently found myself needing better integration of jcov into
> various
> >     build/testing tools, so I did two things.  First, I modified the jcov
> >     tool to generate a report in the Cobertura XML format, which is used
> by
> >     Jenkins and other tools as an input format.  While these reports are
> >     inferior in my opinion to the HTML reports jcov generates, they do
> allow
> >     integration with other tools and CI systems.  Therefore, I think
> >     providing this functionality would likely encourage more people to
> use
> >     jcov over the alternatives.
> >
> >     I've attached the patch for this modification here, if anyone would
> like
> >     to review it.
> >
> >
> >     I've also mostly wrangled the Maven plugin API to create a plugin for
> >     using jcov in a Maven project (however, there is one remaining issue
> >     with documentation generation that I need to correct before I call
> the
> >     plugin "finished").  I'm not sure if that would be something that
> would
> >     be added to codetools, if the group ID should be something like
> >     "org.openjdk", or what else ought to be done about it.  I will gladly
> >     contribute the code if there's a desire to adopt it.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers, Martijn (Sent from Gmail Mobile)
>