Proposal: Automatic Resource Management

[Neal Gafter]

I would expect it to be the same as if the iterator had been closed
explicitly.

On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Paulo Levi <i30817 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I meant autoclosing the iterable results, passed on to a (running)
> thread ofcourse. For example the parallel array from JSR 166.
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Paulo Levi<i30817 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > What's the interaction of autoclosing iterables with threads inside the
> for?
> >
>
>