Fwd: Proposal: Automatic Resource Management

[Paulo Levi]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paulo Levi <i30817 at gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: Proposal: Automatic Resource Management
To: Neal Gafter <neal at gafter.com>


Actually isn't parallelarray a fork-join variant, so no problem there.
Disregard this.

On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Neal Gafter<neal at gafter.com> wrote:
> I would expect it to be the same as if the iterator had been closed
> explicitly.
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Paulo Levi <i30817 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I meant autoclosing the iterable results, passed on to a (running)
>> thread ofcourse. For example the parallel array from JSR 166.
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Paulo Levi<i30817 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > What's the interaction of autoclosing iterables with threads inside the
>> > for?
>> >
>>
>
>