RFR: 8056258: Analysis of public API does not take super classes into account

[Joel Borggrén-Franck]

Hi,

On 28 Sep 2014, at 14:20, Fredrik Öhrström <oehrstroem at gmail.com> wrote:

> Great looking code and I am +1 for committing this as it is! 
> 
> Would you say that scanning the AST incurs a slight performance degradation compared to the previous solution? Can we in the future merge public api generation with AST dependency scanning?
> 

IIRC we measured adding a new pass over the AST a while back and it wasn’t noticeable. I do want to redo those measurements to see if this is still the case, but I would suspect it still to be true.

cheers
/Joel