[langtools] RFR (L): 8010319: Implementation of JEP 181: Nest-Based Access Control
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Thu Jun 7 12:11:21 UTC 2018
Thanks Maurizio!
David
On 7/06/2018 9:42 PM, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
> Looks good
>
> Thanks David
>
> Maurizio
>
>
> On 07/06/18 11:02, David Holmes wrote:
>> Hi compiler-team,
>>
>> Was just getting ready to push this when I discovered a newly added
>> test doesn't pass under nestmates:
>>
>> tools/javac/classfiles/attributes/Synthetic/AccessToPrivateInnerClassConstructorsTest.java
>>
>>
>> webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8010319-JEP181/webrev.langtools.v5-incr/
>>
>>
>> Fix was to reduce expected number of synthetic methods from 2 to 0,
>> and expected number of synthetic classes from 1 to 0. This is similar
>> to a previous change:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8010319-JEP181/webrev.langtools.v1/test/langtools/tools/javac/classfiles/attributes/Synthetic/AccessToPrivateInnerClassMembersTest.java.cdiff.html
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>>
>> On 15/05/2018 10:52 AM, David Holmes wrote:
>>> This review is being spread across four groups: langtools, core-libs,
>>> hotspot and serviceability. This is the specific review thread for
>>> langtools - webrev:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8010319-JEP181/webrev.langtools.v1/
>>>
>>> See below for full details - including annotated full webrev guiding
>>> the review.
>>>
>>> The intent is to have JEP-181 targeted and integrated by the end of
>>> this month.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> David
>>> -----
>>>
>>> The nestmates project (JEP-181) introduces new classfile attributes
>>> to identify classes and interfaces in the same nest, so that the VM
>>> can perform access control based on those attributes and so allow
>>> direct private access between nestmates without requiring javac to
>>> generate synthetic accessor methods. These access control changes
>>> also extend to core reflection and the MethodHandle.Lookup contexts.
>>>
>>> Direct private calls between nestmates requires a more general
>>> calling context than is permitted by invokespecial, and so the JVMS
>>> is updated to allow, and javac updated to use, invokevirtual and
>>> invokeinterface for private class and interface method calls
>>> respectively. These changed semantics also extend to MethodHandle
>>> findXXX operations.
>>>
>>> At this time we are only concerned with static nest definitions,
>>> which map to a top-level class/interface as the nest-host and all its
>>> nested types as nest-members.
>>>
>>> Please see the JEP for further details.
>>>
>>> JEP: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046171
>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8010319
>>> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8197445
>>>
>>> All of the specification changes have been previously been worked out
>>> by the Valhalla Project Expert Group, and the implementation reviewed
>>> by the various contributors and discussed on the valhalla-dev mailing
>>> list.
>>>
>>> Acknowledgments and contributions: Alex Buckley, Maurizio Cimadamore,
>>> Mandy Chung, Tobias Hartmann, Vladimir Ivanov, Karen Kinnear,
>>> Vladimir Kozlov, John Rose, Dan Smith, Serguei Spitsyn, Kumar Srinivasan
>>>
>>> Master webrev of all changes:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8010319-JEP181/webrev.full.v1/
>>>
>>> Annotated master webrev index:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8010319-JEP181/jep181-webrev.html
>>>
>>> Performance: this is expected to be performance neutral in a general
>>> sense. Benchmarking and performance runs are about to start.
>>>
>>> Testing Discussion:
>>> ------------------
>>>
>>> The testing for nestmates can be broken into four main groups:
>>>
>>> - New tests specifically related to nestmates and currently in the
>>> runtime/Nestmates directory
>>>
>>> - New tests to complement existing tests by adding in testcases not
>>> previously expressible.
>>> - For example java/lang/invoke/SpecialInterfaceCall.java tests
>>> use of invokespecial for private interface methods and performing
>>> receiver typechecks, so we add
>>> java/lang/invoke/PrivateInterfaceCall.java to do similar tests for
>>> invokeinterface.
>>>
>>> - New JVM TI tests to verify the spec changes related to nest
>>> attributes.
>>>
>>> - Existing tests significantly affected by the nestmates changes,
>>> primarily:
>>> - runtime/SelectionResolution
>>>
>>> In most cases the nestmate changes makes certain invocations that
>>> were illegal, legal (e.g. not requiring invokespecial to invoke
>>> private interface methods; allowing access to private members via
>>> reflection/Methodhandles that were previously not allowed).
>>>
>>> - Existing tests incidentally affected by the nestmate changes
>>>
>>> This includes tests of things utilising class
>>> redefinition/retransformation to alter nested types but which
>>> unintentionally alter nest relationships (which is not permitted).
>>>
>>> There are still a number of tests problem-listed with issues filed
>>> against them to have them adapted to work with nestmates. Some of
>>> these are intended to be addressed in the short-term, while some
>>> (such as the runtime/SelectionResolution test changes) may not
>>> eventuate.
>>>
>>> - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203033
>>> - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199450
>>> - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8196855
>>> - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194857
>>> - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187655
>>>
>>> There is also further test work still to be completed (the JNI and
>>> JDI invocation tests):
>>> - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8191117
>>> which will continue in parallel with the main RFR.
>>>
>>> Pre-integration Testing:
>>> - General:
>>> - Mach5: hs/jdk tier1,2
>>> - Mach5: hs-nightly (tiers 1 -3)
>>> - Targetted
>>> - nashorn (for asm changes)
>>> - hotspot: runtime/*
>>> serviceability/*
>>> compiler/*
>>> vmTestbase/*
>>> - jdk: java/lang/invoke/*
>>> java/lang/reflect/*
>>> java/lang/instrument/*
>>> java/lang/Class/*
>>> java/lang/management/*
>>> - langtools: tools/javac
>>> tools/javap
>>>
>
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list