RFR(13): JDK-8217047: Provide a way to inject missing parameter names

Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Sat Mar 16 00:32:33 UTC 2019


Nice.  Minor comments...

The {@linkplain}don't seem to be working as expected;  I suspect you 
need to import the type names. Also, you should use parens and arg types 
on links to methods; if you don't want the `(arg-types)` to show up in 
the docs, use the form of {@linkplain} that allows you to specify the 
text to be linked.

The new method in JavacTask should have an implNote that says, "This 
Implementation does nothing." or words to that effect.

(Aside: we have a more general problem with implNotes, that we have 
places where the default is to do nothing or throw UOE, but the reality 
is that the real-world impl of these methods does something useful. I 
don't know how/where we should document that behavior. But that's a 
bigger question for another time and another review.)

Flags.java

typo: friedly

ClassReader ... just curious, you always create a new ParamSymbol, even 
when you could use a VarSymbol (because you have already filled in the 
name).  I guess the code is neater/more consistent the way you have it.

MissingInfoHandler ... no class-level doc comment. I realize it's an 
internal class but even so ...

-- Jon


On 01/21/2019 04:32 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When a type is load from a classfile, and some or all of its methods 
> have neither the MethodParameters or LocalVariableTable attributes, 
> then the parameters of the methods have an artificial synthesized 
> name, which is visible through VariableElement.getSimpleName().
>
> The proposal here is to allow to plug in an external provider that 
> could provide more user-friendly names lazily/on demand. These could 
> originate e.g. in adjacent sources.
>
> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8217437
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/8217047/webrev.01/
> Specdiff: 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/8217047/specdiff.01/overview-summary.html
>
> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8217437
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks,
>     Jan

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/attachments/20190315/773ce969/attachment.html>


More information about the compiler-dev mailing list