Bugs that are inadvertently fixed

[Archie Cobbs]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 3:45 PM Michel Trudeau <michel.trudeau at oracle.com>
wrote:

> Please keep reporting.   It’s useful info.
>

Here are a few more that I've found so far. FYI I'm testing with JDK 19.

JDK-7158531 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-7158531> - Not sure (no
reproducing example given) but from inspection it looks like it's fixed

JDK-7167356 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-7167356> - Partially fixed
JavacParserTest.testPositionBrokenSource126732a() is working now - can be
re-enabled
JavacParserTest.testPositionBrokenSource126732b() is working now - can be
re-enabled
JavacParserTest.testStartPositionEnumConstantInit() is still broken

JDK-8006042 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8006042> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8024687 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8024687> - Possibly fixed?
- the behavior has changed at least:

Test.java:3: error: namePrep has private access in IDN
{ IDN.namePrep.toString(); }
     ^
Test.java:3: error: Object.toString() is defined in an inaccessible class
or interface
{ IDN.namePrep.toString(); }
              ^
2 errors

JDK-8024317 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8024317> - Locking is no
longer used so the bug as reported appears to be fixed.

JDK-8027682 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8027682> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8034251 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8034251> - I don't
understand what the bug is here. Compiler seems to be doing the right thing.

JDK-8043279 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8043279> - Appears to be
fixed (based on the linked test case in JDK-8034147
<https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8034147>)

JDK-8044734 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8044734> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8048547 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8048547> - Appears to be
fixed

These next six bugs all seem to be one identical bug filed multiple times:

JDK-8052121 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8052121> - Appears to be
fixed
JDK-8052135 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8052135> - Appears to be
fixed
JDK-8054274 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8054274> - Appears to be
fixed
JDK-8054275 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8054275> - Appears to be
fixed
JDK-8054276 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8054276> - Appears to be
fixed
JDK-8054284 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8054284> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8065572 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8065572> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8065988 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8065988> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8130386 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8130386> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8130401 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8130401> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8151992 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8151992> - Probably can
resolve now as not reproducible

JDK-8152894 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8152894> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8155907 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8155907> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8157773 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8157773> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8159667 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8159667> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8166209 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8166209> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8172106 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8172106> - Soon to be
"inadvertently" fixed by pr#10803
<https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/10803> :)

JDK-8174921 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8174921> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8179359 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8179359> - Link to test
case is broken, so this bug seems no longer decipherable

JDK-8180387 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8180387> - Is fixed to the
extent that the JavacTask() constructor is now documented

JDK-8184324 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8184324> - Probably no
longer reproducible because it's based on another project in 2017

JDK-8184224 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8184224> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8186030 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8186030> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8187425 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8187425> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8191896 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8191896> - IMHO this is
not a bug. The compiler is simply reporting only the first of two problems.

JDK-8194847 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8194847> - Appears to be
fixed

JDK-8200156 <https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8200156> - Appears to be
fixed

This has been an interesting tour so far. I'm going in order of creation
time and am up to March 2018. Just looking at ones that are easy for me to
try to reproduce.

My query is: component = tools AND Subcomponent = javac AND status = OPEN
AND type = Bug order by created asc

Several of the old bugs that are still around are stuck waiting on JLS
clarification. I wonder whether that has happened, or whether JLS
clarification is itself somehow stuck (a thought that's slightly
disturbing).

-Archie

-- 
Archie L. Cobbs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/compiler-dev/attachments/20221020/dce56100/attachment.htm>