Code review request for 6543593 "(reflect) Clarify private final field mutability"

[Joe Darcy]

Alan Bateman wrote:
> Joe Darcy wrote:
>>
>> Fair enough.  How about just for the setter methods
>>
>> +     * @exception IllegalAccessException    if this {@code Field} 
>> object
>> +     *              enforces Java language access control and the 
>> underlying
>> +     *              field is inaccessible or is final.
> I think a comma before the "and" would make this a bit clearer (as the 
> two conjunctions might force the reader to read it more than once to 
> get the meaning).
>
> -Alan.

How about for the setters

     * @exception IllegalAccessException    if this {@code Field} object
     *              enforces Java language access control and the underlying
     *              field is either inaccessible or final.

Updated webrev at

    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/6543593.1/

Thanks,

-Joe