typo in comments of JVM_SupportsCX8 in jvm.h

[David Holmes]

On 8/06/2012 6:39 AM, chris hegarty wrote:
> Looks fine Kris (given the same change is being made to
> hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/jvm.h)
>
> I can sponsor this for you. We can use the same bug number seeing as
> these are two separate repositories.

Bzzzt! No you can't!

In theory you can use one CR to cover a combined change across multiple 
repos (eg open and closed).

But you can't use one CR to cover a change in two different components: 
hotspot and jdk. One has to be filed against jvm->hotspot->whatever, the 
other against java->java->whatever.

David
----

> -Chris.
>
> On 07/06/2012 21:10, Krystal Mok wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As discussed on hotspot-compiler-dev [1], I came across a typo in the
>> exported jvm.h in the jdk workspace while working on 7174218.
>> The fix is simple [2], and sync up with the changes in 7174218:
>>
>> diff -r 7def50698e78 src/share/javavm/export/jvm.h
>> --- a/src/share/javavm/export/jvm.h Thu May 24 16:15:58 2012 -0700
>> +++ b/src/share/javavm/export/jvm.h Wed Jun 06 01:15:50 2012 +0800
>> @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@
>> JVM_AssertionStatusDirectives(JNIEnv *env, jclass unused);
>>
>> /*
>> - * java.util.concurrent.AtomicLong
>> + * java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong
>> */
>> JNIEXPORT jboolean JNICALL
>> JVM_SupportsCX8(void);
>>
>> Could someone review and sponsor this fix, please?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kris Mok
>>
>> [1]:
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2012-June/007798.html
>>
>> [2]:
>> https://gist.github.com/2876357#file_remove_atomic_long_cs_impl_jdk.patch