Review/comment needed for the new public java.util.Base64 class

Xueming Shen xueming.shen at oracle.com
Sat Oct 20 00:03:59 UTC 2012


I see a 20% performance gain on server vm if switch to pure char[] based 
encoding
and then use the sharedSecrets to avoid the copy. The dis-advantage is 
(1) have to
use the sharedSecrets and (2) can't share the same between the 
encode(byte[])
and encode(String).

Anyway it appears to be an alternative for performance improvement.

-Sherman


On 10/18/2012 01:07 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
> I wonder if there would be advantage in using a SharedSecrets mechanism to allow construction of a String directly from a char array. The intermediate byte array seems wasteful especially for what is likely to be a heavily used path.
>
> Mike
>
> On Oct 17 2012, at 19:10 , Xueming Shen wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Webrev has been updated with following changes
>>
>> (1) added a pair of en/decode(ByteBuffer src, ByteBuffer dst) methods
>> (2) some minor spec clarification regarding the "end of decoding"
>> (3) performance tuning.
>>
>> webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/4235519/webrev
>>
>> some performance scores:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/4235519/score3
>>
>> -Sherman




More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list