Java 8 RFR 8020539: Clean up doclint problems in java.util package, part 2
Chris Hegarty
chris.hegarty at oracle.com
Mon Jul 29 09:43:35 UTC 2013
> .....
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8020539/
Brian,
Looks fine ( I did not go through the Scanner changes ).
Some minor comments:
1) List
Trivially I wonder why you decided to go with '< '>', rather
than <pre>{@code ... }</pre>, which I think is more readable.
2) Map
Trivially, I would keep the @param's order the same as the actual
method parameters order.
3) Optional
Strangely, there doesn't appear to be a '@param' for the class level
type T. doclint is not warning about this either.
-Chris.
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list