JDK8 RFR JDK-8029237 Update copyright year to match last edit in jdk8 jaxws repository for 2013

[Chris Hegarty]

Miran,

Since you have two separate changesets, I created a subtask and pushed 
the 2013 updates under that bugId. The changes are now in jdk9/dev.

-Chris.

On 24/01/14 10:50, Miroslav Kos wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> I missed that, sorry. Yes please push it to jdk9, it will do the job
> there too...
>
> Thanks
> Miran
>
> On 24/01/14 11:12, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> Miran,
>>
>> This bug has not been approved for JDK 8, in fact it was considered
>> and rejected. The fix should be pushed to jdk9/dev, if applicable. If
>> the patches apply cleanly I can push it for you. Do you want it in JDK 9?
>>
>> -Chris.
>>
>>
>> On 24/01/14 09:41, Miroslav Kos wrote:
>>> Hi Chris,
>>> thanks for reviewing - I generated the patches today again so now it
>>> should be ok:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mkos/8029237/copyrights-2012-v02.patch
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mkos/8029237/copyrights-2013-v02.patch
>>>
>>> Could you push it for me? I have no rights for jdk8.
>>>
>>> I suppose the commit dates (must be in the past) would be imported
>>> correctly:
>>>
>>> copyrights-2012-v02.patch: -d "2012-12-30"
>>> copyrights-2013-v02.patch: -d "2013-12-30"
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Miran
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23/01/14 10:07, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>>> On 23 Jan 2014, at 08:53, Martin Grebac <martin.grebac at oracle.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Miran, did you get any response on this yet?
>>>>> MartiNG
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17/01/14 10:57, Miroslav Kos wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Steve and Alan,
>>>>>> I just reminding this issue - I have no response from anybody yet
>>>>>> and it would really simplify our integration if I could handle
>>>>>> copyright years inconsistencies this way - I see this issue in many
>>>>>> jdk branches and these "each-branch-different" changes make each
>>>>>> integration much more pain.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for any idea on this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Miran
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/01/14 18:05, Miroslav Kos wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> this is about fixing copyright years for jdk8 (!); the incorrect
>>>>>>> years found for both 2012 and 2013, so not to confuse script
>>>>>>> jdk8/make/scripts/update_copyright_year.sh
>>>>>>> it is necessary to use option -d "<date>" for commit. I tested that
>>>>>>> and it seems to work perfect.
>>>>>>> I used following:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [2012 modifications]
>>>>>>> hg commit -u mkos -l ../2012-msg.txt -d "2012-12-30"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [2013 modifications]
>>>>>>> hg commit -u mkos -l ../2013-msg.txt -d "2013-12-30"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When commits performed with past date, update_copyright_year.sh
>>>>>>> script finds those in proper years. Since I am not familiar with
>>>>>>> using webrev for pushing changes, I exported both revisions into
>>>>>>> separate patches:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2012: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mkos/8029237/copyrights-2012.patch
>>>> I skimmed the patch and it looks ok to me.
>>>>
>>>> Trivially, it contains a 2013 update (which it should probably be in
>>>> the 2013 patch)
>>>>
>>>> diff -r 91f5c542ccad -r d6aec26c9771 make/Makefile
>>>> --- a/make/Makefile    Fri Jan 03 11:54:55 2014 -0800
>>>> +++ b/make/Makefile    Sun Dec 30 00:00:00 2012 +0100
>>>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>>>   #
>>>> -# Copyright (c) 2012, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights
>>>> reserved.
>>>> +# Copyright (c) 2012, 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights
>>>> reserved.
>>>>   # DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
>>>>   #
>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mkos/8029237/copyrights-2013.patch
>>>> Looks ok to me.
>>>>
>>>> -Chris.
>>>>
>>>>>>> all changes webrev:
>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mkos/8029237/webrev-all.00/ (upload
>>>>>>> still in progress, I hope it doesn't take more than 30 mins)
>>>>>>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029237
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Miran
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Martin Grebac, SW Engineering Manager
>>>>> Oracle Czech, Prague
>>>>>
>>>
>