[8011944] Sort fails with ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
Miroslaw Niemiec
Miroslaw.Niemiec at Oracle.COM
Thu Jan 30 02:34:03 UTC 2014
On 1/24/2014 1:33 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 23/01/2014 22:55, Miroslaw Niemiec wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> This is a simple backport from 8 to 7.
>> Looking for a review of this even though it only requires a testcase
>> change due to the use of lambda expressions.
>> Since this is the first of these I've encountered I thought I better
>> play it safe, but generally speaking, are we ok
>> to skip the review process for backports like this? (minor lambda
>> related testcase changes - if the lambda's are in the actual fix it
>> probably makes sense to re-review).
> It often happens that "small adjustments" are required when
> back-porting. To date then it's been a mix of just highlighting in the
> approval request to jdk7u-dev, sometimes the mailing list where the
> issue was originally reviewed is included. It's really just a
> judgement call as sometimes the adjustments are trivial, sometimes a
> bit more. The jdk7u maintainers are good about asking for additional
> review where it might be needed.
>
> For cases like this one then it's best to start with the test pushed
> to the jdk8 forest and then just replace the use of new language
> features so that it compiles/runs on jdk7u. In this this case it seems
> okay, just make sure (as others have pointed out) not to remove the
> copyright header.
>
> -Alan.
The copyright header added to test/java/util/Arrays/TimSortStackSize.java:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~miroslawzn/8011944/webrev.02/
- Miroslaw
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list