2d reviewer please . Re: RFR : JDK-8046545 launcher fix to check function return values

Kevin Rushforth kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
Wed Jul 23 23:06:55 UTC 2014


I might suggest Phil Race or Andrew Brygin, but you could also just send 
e-mail to 2d-dev at openjdk.java.net and ask for a volunteer (I am not a 
Reviewer for 2D).

-- Kevin


Neil Toda wrote:
>
> I'm hoping some one will volunteer to be a 2d reviewer so we can 
> satisfy jcheck requirement for a 2d
> review for this 8u patch.
>
> It is a very simple set of macros and a couple of applications that we 
> hope to use going forward
> in making sure that JNI exceptions are caught in the launcher.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntoda/8046545/webrev-02/
>
> Thanks
>
> -neil
>
> On 7/21/2014 9:31 AM, Neil Toda wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kumar
>>
>> Actually, the null check macros have different parameters.   
>> NCRV_return_value is an integer.
>> RETURNVALUE in CHECK_JNI_RETURN is a macro,  which allows us to have 
>> only the two macros:
>> CHECK_JNI_RETURN
>> and
>> CHECK_JNI_RETRUN_EXCEPTION
>>
>> I also think it is cleaner since there are only two, and they are for 
>> JNI, to keep them self contained.
>>
>> Would someone be willing to review webrev-02, which contain Kumar's 
>> suggested change in the
>> comments included with the macros.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -neil
>>
>>
>> On 7/19/2014 8:02 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
>>> [ Since I am sponsoring this patch, I think jcheck needs one more 
>>> Reviewer besides myself]
>>>
>>> Neil,
>>>
>>> looking at your webrev: 
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntoda/8046545/webrev-02/
>>>
>>> Can we not re-use the existing macro for null check ?
>>>
>>> #define NULL_CHECK_RETURN_VALUE(NCRV_check_pointer, NCRV_return_value)
>>>
>>> so thus your new macro would become....
>>>
>>> +#define CHECK_JNI_RETURN(JNIRETURN, RETURNVALUE) \
>>> +    CHECK_JNI_RETURN_EXCEPTION(RETURNVALUE); \
>>> -    do { \
>>> -        if ((JNIRETURN) == NULL) { \
>>> -            JLI_ReportErrorMessage(JNI_ERROR); \
>>> -            RETURNVALUE; \
>>> -        } \
>>> -    } while (JNI_FALSE)
>>> +    NULL_CHECK_RETURN_VALUE(JNI_RETURN, RETURN_VALUE);
>>>
>>>
>>> Kumar
>>>
>>> On 7/18/2014 10:40 AM, Neil Toda wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Kumar.  Yes, misspoke here.  Will correct the comment.
>>>>
>>>> On 7/18/2014 10:35 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
>>>>> Neil,
>>>>> The fix looks good. However there is an inaccuracy in the comment:
>>>>>
>>>>> + *  Normally, JNI calls do not return if an exception is thrown.
>>>>> + *  However, this behavior can change in the future,
>>>>> + *  so check for thrown exceptions.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is not true, JNI calls *will* return if an exception is 
>>>>> thrown, however best
>>>>> JNI practices dictate that a pending Exception(s) must be cleared 
>>>>> or caught, before
>>>>> attempting another JNI call. Under such circumstances the return 
>>>>> value will usually
>>>>> be an error or a null value. I suggest making this change to 
>>>>> reflect this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Kumar
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/18/2014 9:53 AM, Neil Toda wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please review this launcher change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046545
>>>>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntoda/8046545/webrev-01/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Summary:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Introduce a set of macros for launcher to be used to check for 
>>>>>> certain conditions after
>>>>>> return from select functions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list