RFR [9] 8041972: Add improved parse/format methods for Long/Integer
Claes Redestad
claes.redestad at oracle.com
Tue Jun 17 15:43:32 UTC 2014
Ok, I'm working on improving code and comments based on feedback. I'll
split the SharedSecrets part out, make the methods public and post a new
webrev soon.
/Claes
On 06/17/2014 04:21 PM, roger riggs wrote:
> Yes, that looks more consistent with the current versions.
>
> Though you want to see these for 8u, the preferred pattern is to make
> the changes
> in 9 and then backport the result (in this case adding the shared
> secrets aspect).
>
> Roger
>
>
> On 6/16/2014 4:13 PM, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> ...
>>> The terminology used in java.lang.String for offsets and indexes
>>> into strings would
>>> be provide a consistent base for talking about substrings.
>> If we're taking cues from String.substring, I guess int beginIndex[,
>> int fromIndex] would be more appropriate. How about:
>>
>> /**
>> * Parses the character sequence argument in the specified {@code
>> radix},
>> * beginning at the specified {@code beginIndex} and extending to
>> the
>> * character at index {@code endIndex - 1}.
>> *
>> * @see java.lang.Integer#parseInt(String, int)
>> * @param s the {@code CharSequence} containing the integer
>> * representation to be parsed
>> * @param radix the radix to be used while parsing {@code s}.
>> * @param beginIndex the beginning index, inclusive.
>> * @param endIndex the ending index, exclusive.
>> * @return the integer represented by the subsequence in the
>> * specified radix.
>> */
>> static int parseInt(CharSequence s, int radix, int beginIndex,
>> int endIndex)
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> /Claes
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list