RFR [9] 8041972: Add improved parse/format methods for Long/Integer
Claes Redestad
claes.redestad at oracle.com
Thu Jun 19 17:39:15 UTC 2014
Hi,
an updated webrev with reworked, public methods is available here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8041972/webrev.8/
Reviews are yet again appreciated!
/Claes
On 06/17/2014 05:43 PM, Claes Redestad wrote:
> Ok, I'm working on improving code and comments based on feedback. I'll
> split the SharedSecrets part out, make the methods public and post a
> new webrev soon.
>
> /Claes
>
> On 06/17/2014 04:21 PM, roger riggs wrote:
>> Yes, that looks more consistent with the current versions.
>>
>> Though you want to see these for 8u, the preferred pattern is to make
>> the changes
>> in 9 and then backport the result (in this case adding the shared
>> secrets aspect).
>>
>> Roger
>>
>>
>> On 6/16/2014 4:13 PM, Claes Redestad wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> The terminology used in java.lang.String for offsets and indexes
>>>> into strings would
>>>> be provide a consistent base for talking about substrings.
>>> If we're taking cues from String.substring, I guess int beginIndex[,
>>> int fromIndex] would be more appropriate. How about:
>>>
>>> /**
>>> * Parses the character sequence argument in the specified
>>> {@code radix},
>>> * beginning at the specified {@code beginIndex} and extending
>>> to the
>>> * character at index {@code endIndex - 1}.
>>> *
>>> * @see java.lang.Integer#parseInt(String, int)
>>> * @param s the {@code CharSequence} containing the integer
>>> * representation to be parsed
>>> * @param radix the radix to be used while parsing {@code
>>> s}.
>>> * @param beginIndex the beginning index, inclusive.
>>> * @param endIndex the ending index, exclusive.
>>> * @return the integer represented by the subsequence in the
>>> * specified radix.
>>> */
>>> static int parseInt(CharSequence s, int radix, int beginIndex,
>>> int endIndex)
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> /Claes
>>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list