8035782 : sun/launcher/LauncherHelper$FXHelper loaded unnecessarily
David DeHaven
david.dehaven at oracle.com
Fri May 2 16:10:59 UTC 2014
That's the first time the pentium bug ever worked in my favor... ;)
The changes look good to me. approved (with a lower case 'a', since I'm not a Reviewer with an upper case 'R').
-DrD-
> 1) Redundant return removed.
>
> 2) Kumar and I talked: Ever since the pentium bug, 1 in 80 trillion seems a big risk .. so the code was changed to
> check for equality with the whole class name:
>
> private static final String JAVAFX_FXHELPER_CLASS_NAME_SUFFIX =
> "sun.launcher.LauncherHelper$FXHelper";
> ...
>
> if (JAVAFX_FXHELPER_CLASS_NAME_SUFFIX.equals(mainClass.getName()) ||
> doesExtendFXApplication(mainClass)) {
> // Will abort() if there are problems with FX runtime
> FXHelper.setFXLaunchParameters(what, mode);
> return FXHelper.class;
> }
>
>
> Thanks
>
> -neil
>
> On 5/1/2014 8:05 AM, David DeHaven wrote:
>> Do we care about the 1 in more than 80 trillion case where the third party Main-Class would be named "LauncherHelper$FXHelper"? I think the probability is extremely unlikely so I'm fine with it the way it's written.
>>
>>
>> LauncherHelper.java:
>> 590 return;
>>
>> Redundant return statement?
>>
>> -DrD-
>>
>>
>>> For completeness the bugid line needs the bugid as shown, otherwise SQE will open
>>> another bug to have you fix this.
>>>
>>> -26 * @bug 8001533 8004547
>>> +26 * @bug 8001533 8004547 8035782
>>>
>>> other than that it looks good, I can push this with the above change.
>>>
>>> Anyone else have any concerns with this change before I push ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Kumar
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/30/2014 1:47 PM, Neil Toda wrote:
>>>> Please review Launcher change and test.
>>>>
>>>> I've added to the Launcher test : FXLauncherTest.java
>>>> The test will now check that LauncherHelper$FXHelper is not loaded for non-JavaFX class and jar files.
>>>>
>>>> webrev.02 contains only review suggestions from webrev.01 and the new test class.
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ntoda/8035782/webrev.02/
>>>>
>>>> for bug:
>>>>
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035782
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> -neil
>>>>
>>>>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list