Review request for JDK-8051710: Convert JAXP function tests: javax.xml.jaxp14.* to jtreg (testng) tests

huizhe wang huizhe.wang at oracle.com
Wed Jan 28 04:43:52 UTC 2015


On 1/27/2015 7:06 PM, Frank Yuan wrote:
> Thank you, Joe.
>
> I will sort the tests as your suggestion, and have 3 questions to confirm
> with you:
> 1. Should I also sort the gap tests?
> 2. Should I put astro suite at side of auctionportal?

Ah, in that case, you may put gap tests alongside the auctionportal as well.
> 3. If a package has very few test, e.g. I may put XMLEventFactoryTest and
> something else in javax.xml.stream.ptest, is it ok? (I would rename
> XMLEventFactoryTest as its small coverage)

Sounds good to me.

Thanks,
Joe

>
> Best Regards
> Frank
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: huizhe wang [mailto:huizhe.wang at oracle.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 10:27 AM
> To: Frank Yuan
> Cc: 'Lance Andersen'; 'Core-Libs-Dev'; 'jibing chen'; 'Gustavo Galimberti';
> sandeep.konchady at oracle.com; 'Alexandre (Shura) Iline'
> Subject: Re: Review request for JDK-8051710: Convert JAXP function tests:
> javax.xml.jaxp14.* to jtreg (testng) tests
>
> Hi Frank,
>
> Nice refactoring the original tests, esp. the TransformerTest!
>
> jaxp14 is legacy in the jaxp standalone world. While we are at this, you may
> want to move these tests to their relevant packages since in the JDK world,
> jaxp14 is no longer relevant (jaxp 1.4 was integrated into JDK 6).  As
> you've already split FactoryTest into various Factory tests, you may find
> them a bit thin in terms of test coverage now that they are named
> *FactoryTest since they cover just one of the two newInstance methods. I
> would think it makes sense to move them into / combine with the Factory
> tests of their own packages.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
> On 1/27/2015 1:09 AM, Frank Yuan wrote:
>> Hi, Joe, Lance and All
>>
>> We are working on moving internal jaxp functional tests to open jdk
> repo.
>> This is the jaxp14 suite. Would you please review these test?  Any
> comment
>> will be appreciated.
>>
>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8051710
>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyuan/8051710/webrev.00/
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Frank
>>
>




More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list