String.contains(CharSequence) calls toString on argument
Vitaly Davidovich
vitalyd at gmail.com
Fri Mar 20 15:48:11 UTC 2015
Yes, but that ought to be for the caller to decide. Also, although the
resulting String is immutable, toString() itself may observe mutation.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Xueming Shen <xueming.shen at oracle.com>
wrote:
> On 03/20/2015 02:34 AM, Tomasz Kowalczewski wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Current implementation of String.contains that accepts CharSequence calls
>> toString on it and passes resulting string to indexOf(String). This IMO
>> defeats the purpose of using CharSequences (that is to have a mutable
>> character buffer and not allocate unnecessary objects).
>>
>>
> It is arguable that cs.toString() may serve the purpose of taking a
> snapshot of an otherwise
> "mutable" character buffer?
>
> -Sherman
>
>
> Is changing this a desirable development? It seems pretty straightforward
>> to port indexOf(String) to use CharSequence.
>>
>> If all you need is patch then I can work on it (I have signed OCA) just
>> wanted to make sure it is not a futile work.
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list