RFR: 8133611: Remove java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock/TimeoutLockLoops.java from problem list

[joe darcy]

Approved; thanks David,

-Joe

On 9/8/2015 9:38 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133611
>
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8133611/webrev/
>
> Patch inline below.
>
> Now the hotspot fix is in place the test can be removed from the 
> problem list and need not be marked "intermittent".
>
> Thanks,
> David
> -----
>
> --- old/test/ProblemList.txt    2015-09-09 00:34:56.091794570 -0400
> +++ new/test/ProblemList.txt    2015-09-09 00:34:54.719717019 -0400
> @@ -363,10 +363,6 @@
>  # 8062512
>
> java/util/spi/ResourceBundleControlProvider/UserDefaultControlTest.java generic-all 
>
>
> -# 8029453
> -java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock/TimeoutLockLoops.java linux-all
> -
> -
>
> ############################################################################ 
>
>
>  # jdk_instrument
> --- 
> old/test/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock/TimeoutLockLoops.java 2015-09-09 
> 00:35:00.104021348 -0400
> +++ 
> new/test/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock/TimeoutLockLoops.java 2015-09-09 
> 00:34:58.715942891 -0400
> @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
>   * @test
>   * @bug 4486658 5031862
>   * @run main TimeoutLockLoops
> - * @key intermittent
>   * @summary Checks for responsiveness of locks to timeouts.
>   * Runs under the assumption that ITERS computations require more than
>   * TIMEOUT msecs to complete, which seems to be a safe assumption for