RFR: 8133611: Remove java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock/TimeoutLockLoops.java from problem list

[David Holmes]

Thanks Joe - pushed.

David

On 9/09/2015 2:42 PM, joe darcy wrote:
> Approved; thanks David,
>
> -Joe
>
> On 9/8/2015 9:38 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133611
>>
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8133611/webrev/
>>
>> Patch inline below.
>>
>> Now the hotspot fix is in place the test can be removed from the
>> problem list and need not be marked "intermittent".
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>> -----
>>
>> --- old/test/ProblemList.txt    2015-09-09 00:34:56.091794570 -0400
>> +++ new/test/ProblemList.txt    2015-09-09 00:34:54.719717019 -0400
>> @@ -363,10 +363,6 @@
>>  # 8062512
>>
>> java/util/spi/ResourceBundleControlProvider/UserDefaultControlTest.java generic-all
>>
>>
>> -# 8029453
>> -java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock/TimeoutLockLoops.java linux-all
>> -
>> -
>>
>> ############################################################################
>>
>>
>>  # jdk_instrument
>> ---
>> old/test/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock/TimeoutLockLoops.java 2015-09-09
>> 00:35:00.104021348 -0400
>> +++
>> new/test/java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock/TimeoutLockLoops.java 2015-09-09
>> 00:34:58.715942891 -0400
>> @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
>>   * @test
>>   * @bug 4486658 5031862
>>   * @run main TimeoutLockLoops
>> - * @key intermittent
>>   * @summary Checks for responsiveness of locks to timeouts.
>>   * Runs under the assumption that ITERS computations require more than
>>   * TIMEOUT msecs to complete, which seems to be a safe assumption for
>