Ping~ Re: RFR 8181080/10, Refactor several sun/net shell tests to plain java tests

Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Sat Jun 10 01:20:07 UTC 2017


On 06/06/2017 07:14 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 06/06/2017 01:43 PM, Felix Yang wrote:
>>> Missed "Add back read access" before trying to delete it?
>> Based on my test results (local and JPRT), it deleted w/o any 
>> exceptions. This was originally added by Max in 
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7078355.
>> TO Max, could you comment if such chmod is still necessary?
>
> I'm not sure now. Re-read JDK-7078355, it seems once upon a time there 
> existed such a system that you have to chmod u+r.
>
>> If yes, since this is just for test clean-up rather than a part of 
>> test logic, is it enough with "File.setReadable(...)"?
>
> My opinion today is to just remove the tearDown() method at all and 
> let jtreg do any cleanup/retain work. Jtreg should do this even if 
> it's a testng test, right?
>
> Thanks
> Max

jtreg should always do cleanup, but I forget whether jtreg may have 
issues with readonly files.   If there are issues, they should be fixed.

-- Jon


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list