[PATCH] Enhancement proposal for TimSort and ComparableTimSort
Сергей Цыпанов
sergei.tsypanov at yandex.ru
Fri Sep 15 09:49:01 UTC 2017
Current implementations of TimSort and ComparableTimSort both have fast path for the case when the size of array = 1 i.e. such array is considered to be sorted.
My proposal is to add similar fast path for the case when the size of the array = 2. In this case it's enough to check if the first item is greater than the second one and swap them.
Otherwise array is considered to be sorted.
I have attached the patch to this mail.
As for performance I have measured array sort with size = 2 using JDK-provided and patched implementations of TimSort and ComparableTimSort both execution time and throughput in two environments:
1) Intel Core i5-4690 3,50 GHz
2) Intel Core i3-3220 3,30 GHz
On both environments I have Java version "1.8.0_144"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_144-b01)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.144-b01, mixed mode)
Measurement results are
1)
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
SortingBenchmark.measureConventionalSort avgt 500 17,692 ± 0,040 ns/op
SortingBenchmark.measureEnhancedSort avgt 500 13,206 ± 0,025 ns/op
SortingBenchmark.measureConventionalSort thrpt 500 56,962 ± 0,051 ops/us
SortingBenchmark.measureEnhancedSort thrpt 500 72,278 ± 0,724 ops/us
2)
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
SortingBenchmark.measureConventionalSort avgt 500 26,173 ± 0,251 ns/op
SortingBenchmark.measureEnhancedSort avgt 500 18,191 ± 0,106 ns/op
SortingBenchmark.measureConventionalSort thrpt 500 36,987 ± 0,437 ops/us
SortingBenchmark.measureEnhancedSort thrpt 500 53,499 ± 0,456 ops/us
So in both cases patched implementation demonstrates better throughput and execution time for the case array.lenght = 2.
Regards,
Sergei Tsypanov
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: patch.txt
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1817 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/attachments/20170915/5386bc4a/patch.txt>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list