RFR 8189717: Too much documentation of ProcessBuilder.start copied to ProcessBuilder.startPipeline

[Roger Riggs]

Hi Lance,

How about:

Subsequent modifications to any of {@code builder}swill not affect the 
returned {@link Process}.

Roger


On 7/13/2018 3:26 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> I am struggling with the wording at:
>
> ———
> * Subsequent modifications to any of process builders in the {@code 
> builders}
> 1198 * argument will not affect the returned {@link Process}.
>
> ————
>
> Maybe specified/provided  process builders
>
> Not sure, will think about it a bit.
>
> Otherwise I think the changes are fine
>> On Jul 13, 2018, at 3:07 PM, Roger Riggs <Roger.Riggs at oracle.com 
>> <mailto:Roger.Riggs at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Please review a doc change to improve the description of 
>> ProcessBuilder.startPipeline.
>> The clarifications are not intended to imply any change in behavior 
>> and only focus the description
>> on the steps taken for each command in the pipeline.
>> (A CSR will be needed also when the wording is finalized).
>>
>> Webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-process-8189717/ 
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erriggs/webrev-process-8189717/>
>> Issue:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8189717
>>
>> Thanks, Roger
>>
>
> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif><http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance 
> Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
> Oracle Java Engineering
> 1 Network Drive
> Burlington, MA 01803
> Lance.Andersen at oracle.com <mailto:Lance.Andersen at oracle.com>
>
>
>