RFR: JDK-8214063: OpenJDK will not build on AIX while using the xlc 13.1 compiler
Ichiroh Takiguchi
takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Nov 26 17:56:13 UTC 2018
Hello Volker.
I posted same kind of fix before:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/ppc-aix-port-dev/2018-June/003551.html
I could not find out brace handling issue on XLC++ 13.1.
For workaround,
======
---
old/src/java.base/share/native/libjimage/NativeImageBuffer.cpp 2018-06-07
21:06:09 +0000
+++
new/src/java.base/share/native/libjimage/NativeImageBuffer.cpp 2018-06-07
21:06:09 +0000
@@ -39,7 +39,9 @@
#include "imageFile.hpp"
#include "inttypes.hpp"
#include "jimage.hpp"
+#if !defined(_AIX)
#include "osSupport.hpp"
+#endif
#include "jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer.h"
======
I think osSupport.hpp is no need for all platform.
(I tested it on Linux and AIX build)
What do you think ?
Thanks,
Ichiroh Takiguchi
IBM Japan, Ltd.
On 2018-11-27 02:06, Volker Simonis wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 2:16 PM Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Volker,
>>
>> Apologies for the delay.
>>
>> I ran the contents of the file as requested (neat tip, thanks!) and I
>> discovered something:
>>
>> If jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer.h contains this:
>>
>> -----
>> extern "C" {
>> __attribute__((visibility("default"))) jobject JNICALL
>> Java_jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer_getNativeMap
>> (JNIEnv *, jclass, jstring);
>> }
>> -----
>>
>> It results in this error:
>>
>> -----
>> blah blah "visibility" may be undeclared or ambiguous.
>> -----
>>
>> But replacing that bit with this code:
>>
>> -----
>> extern "C" __attribute__((visibility("default"))) jobject JNICALL
>> Java_jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer_getNativeMap
>> (JNIEnv *, jclass, jstring);
>> -----
>>
>> Results in no error.
>>
>> So it seems the difference between an "extern "C"" block and an inline
>> "extern"C"" is what's causing the issue.
>>
>
> Thanks for finding this out. Now at least we know the root cause of the
> problem.
>
> Without having read through the C++ specification, I'd assume this is
> a problem of XLC 13.
>
> As long as XLC has problems to parse such kinds of constructs, I thing
> we should just remove "-qvisibility" from the AIX build as proposed by
> Magnus (and called "plan B" in you other mail) because changing the
> javah generator for AIX would be a much larger task.
>
> Thank you and best regards,
> Volker
>
>> I don't understand why, but there we have it.
>>
>> A shame the header file is generated. An ideal fix would either be to:
>>
>> 1) Change xlC to make this work inside an extern "C" block.
>> or
>> 2) Change the way the header file is generated to add that extern "C"
>> bit onto the line itself.
>>
>> However both of those have the potential to break other stuff.
>>
>> I'm reaching out to the xlC developers now to figure out what's going
>> on, but in the
>> meantime it seems to me like the proposed fix is still the right way
>> to go for a short-term
>> resolution.
>>
>> What are your thoughts?
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Adam Farley
>> IBM Runtimes
>>
>>
>> Volker Simonis <volker.simonis at gmail.com> wrote on 22/11/2018
>> 14:25:04:
>>
>> > From: Volker Simonis <volker.simonis at gmail.com>
>> > To: adam.farley at uk.ibm.com
>> > Cc: Java Core Libs <core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net>, "Stuefe,
>> > Thomas" <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com>
>> > Date: 22/11/2018 14:25
>> > Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8214063: OpenJDK will not build on AIX while
>> > using the xlc 13.1 compiler
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 3:00 PM Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi Volker,
>> > >
>> > > 1) Here is the "reasonable" code in the generated
>> > jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer.h
>> > >
>> > > ------------------------------------------------------
>> > > /* DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - it is machine generated */
>> > > #include <jni.h>
>> > > /* Header for class jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer */
>> > >
>> > > #ifndef _Included_jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer
>> > > #define _Included_jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer
>> > > #ifdef __cplusplus
>> > > extern "C" {
>> > > #endif
>> > > /*
>> > > * Class: jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer
>> > > * Method: getNativeMap
>> > > * Signature: (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/nio/ByteBuffer;
>> > > */
>> > > JNIEXPORT jobject JNICALL
>> > Java_jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer_getNativeMap
>> > > (JNIEnv *, jclass, jstring);
>> > >
>> > > #ifdef __cplusplus
>> > > }
>> > > #endif
>> > > #endif
>> > > ------------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 2) I have not yet reported this as a bug to the xlc developers. I
>> > will contact
>> > > them now.
>> > >
>> > > 3) I did some experimenting, and it seems that the
>> > NativeImageBuffer.cpp change
>> > > is the only thing standing between us and a successful compilation
>> > on aix using
>> > > xlc 13.1 (assuming you're using source that compiles on aix with xlc 12.1).
>> > >
>> > > With that change (plus the jni_md change), the compilation completes.
>> > >
>> > > Without that change (after you've added the jni_md change though),the build
>> > > will fail with this error message:
>> > >
>> > > ------------------------------------------------------
>> > > 12:19:58 "/workspace/build/aix-ppc64-normal-server-release/
>> > support/headers/java.base/jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer.h",
>> > line 15.27: 1540-0040 (S) The text
>> > "Java_jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer_getNativeMap" is
>> > unexpected. "visibility" may be undeclared or ambiguous.
>> > > 12:19:59 CoreLibraries.gmk:192: recipe for target '/workspace/
>> > build/aix-ppc64-normal-server-release/support/native/java.base/
>> > libjimage/NativeImageBuffer.o' failed
>> > > ------------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> >
>> > Can you please do the following:
>> > - take the command line from
>> > /workspace/build/aix-ppc64-normal-server-release/support/native/
>> > java.base/libjimage/NativeImageBuffer.o.cmdline
>> > - replace '-c' with '-E' to get the preprocessor output
>> > - have a look at the offending line (e.g. have JNIEXPORT / JNICALL
>> > been correctly expanded ?)
>> >
>> > Unfortunately I don't have a version of XLC 13 to test this.
>> >
>> > > Best Regards
>> > >
>> > > Adam Farley
>> > > IBM Runtimes
>> > >
>> > > P.S. Tried making a small, stand-alone example and it failed to
>> > reproduce the problem.
>> > > Will keep trying, and I'll supply a further update in the event of
>> > a) results,
>> > > or b) a response from the xlc guys.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Volker Simonis <volker.simonis at gmail.com> wrote on 21/11/2018 14:07:07:
>> > >
>> > > > From: Volker Simonis <volker.simonis at gmail.com>
>> > > > To: adam.farley at uk.ibm.com
>> > > > Cc: Java Core Libs <core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net>, "Stuefe,
>> > > > Thomas" <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com>
>> > > > Date: 21/11/2018 14:07
>> > > > Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8214063: OpenJDK will not build on AIX while
>> > > > using the xlc 13.1 compiler
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 1:46 PM Adam Farley8
>> > <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hi Volker,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The NativeImageBuffer.cpp changes are best explained by the full text of
>> > > > > the referenced GitHub Pull Request, copied here for simplicity:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -----------------------------------------
>> > > > > Define JNIEXPORT and JNIIMPORT for xlc version 13.1 or newer.
>> > Without this,
>> > > > > almost no symbols are exported from shared libraries due to use of
>> > > > > -qvisibility=hidden as specified in make/lib/LibCommon.gmk. The symptoms
>> > > > > are reported in eclipse/openj9#2468.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Unfortunately, this encounters a bug in xlc: it fails to parsewhat seems
>> > > > > to be reasonable code.
>> > > >
>> > > > Sorry, but I don't see how this answers my question.
>> > > >
>> > > > 1. Which "reasonable code" does xlc fails to parse. A stand-alone
>> > > > example would be nice.
>> > > >
>> > > > 2. Have you reported this as bug to the xlc developers? What didthey say?
>> > > >
>> > > > 3. "jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer.h" doesn't seem to be
>> > > > special. It's a plain, generated JNI header file as generated by
>> > > > 'javah' or 'javac -h'. If XLC 13 has problems parsing it, there should
>> > > > be much more places which need fixing. So what's special about
>> > > > "jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer.h".
>> > > >
>> > > > In the referenced pull request
>> > > > (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>> > > >
>> > u=https-3A__github.com_eclipse_openj9_issues_2468&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
>> > > > siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-
>> > > >
>> > CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=sgfFd6mB1EYM4nOM89rgFFzUyX7B21XbckIY7L0kUNU&s=TJ-4nr8ikZKImwDygirRTxLybsnQWBN71nEZCwZ59NQ&e=
>> > > > ) I can only see linker
>> > > > errors (and no compiler errors). The linker errors are for both
>> > > > libjsig and libjava. They are related to the symbol ".sigaction" in
>> > > > jsig.o and I don't see how this should be related to
>> > > > NativeImageBuffer.cpp or "jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer.h".
>> > > > NativeImageBuffer.cpp is only used to create libjimage and not related
>> > > > in any way to libjsig or libjava.
>> > > >
>> > > > It seems wired to do the change to NativeImageBuffer.cpp which you've
>> > > > proposed without understanding the real cause of the problem.
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > Volker
>> > > >
>> > > > > A workaround is required in just one place:
>> > > > > src/java.base/share/native/libjimage/NativeImageBuffer.cpp.
>> > > > > -----------------------------------------
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Best Regards
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Adam Farley
>> > > > > IBM Runtimes
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Volker Simonis <volker.simonis at gmail.com> wrote on 20/11/2018 17:50:41:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > From: Volker Simonis <volker.simonis at gmail.com>
>> > > > > > To: "Stuefe, Thomas" <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com>
>> > > > > > Cc: adam.farley at uk.ibm.com, Java Core Libs <core-libs-
>> > > > dev at openjdk.java.net>
>> > > > > > Date: 20/11/2018 17:59
>> > > > > > Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8214063: OpenJDK will not build on AIX while
>> > > > > > using the xlc 13.1 compiler
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 6:15 PM Thomas Stüfe
>> > > > <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 6:12 PM Adam Farley8
>> > > > <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Heya Tom,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > "In JDK11 and JDK12, source files are compiled with -
>> > > > qvisibility=hidden
>> > > > > > > > when using xlc version other than 12.1. That doesn't
>> > seem toplay well
>> > > > > > > > with link option -bexpall. "
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Found that buried in one of the associated Git issues.
>> > It appears that
>> > > > > > > > it's OpenJDK's use of that option that's causing the
>> > problem, though
>> > > > > > > > I couldn't speculate as to why it was added in the first place.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I see this has also been noted in https://
>> > > > > > urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D8204541&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
>> > > > > > siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=SD6UdjysISJRBlWUm8pEzF5lRZ5opfbrKzEh_jrOras&s=5qDEdIfg8qZ-
>> > > > > > vCglsZ9qNDTEPMnCkj-mVPVah6eEDLE&e=
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Does that answer your question?
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Yes, Thank you. Odd. Will have to do archeology on that one.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > No I begin to understand the problem as well :)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > It was actually change "8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not
>> > > > > > support on xlc 12.1" [1] which introduced "-qvisibility=hidden" for
>> > > > > > XLC version not equal to 12.1. That's kind of a weak check and I
>> > > > > > suppose nobody has ever tested this change with an XLC version other
>> > > > > > than 12.1 (until you came along :). Maybe that check should be a more
>> > > > > > precisly check for >= 13.1 (but I know such version checks are hard to
>> > > > > > do in Makefile syntax)?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The thing I don't understand about your patch (the changes in
>> > > > > > "jni_md.h" look good although I haven't tested them) is why you need
>> > > > > > the extra changes in NativeImageBuffer.cpp?
>> > > > > > "jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer.h" is a plain, generated JNI
>> > > > > > header file. If XLC 13 has problems to parse it, there should be much
>> > > > > > more places which need fixing. I think that part of your change needs
>> > > > > > a closer evaluation.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thank you and best regards,
>> > > > > > Volker
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D8202322&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
>> > > > > > siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=SD6UdjysISJRBlWUm8pEzF5lRZ5opfbrKzEh_jrOras&s=JAEK6rePGMPinZzOquHBzj5oc7vA3kaFt9x0WIIUzvk&e=
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > ..Thomas
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Best Regards
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Adam Farley
>> > > > > > > > IBM Runtimes
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > "Thomas Stüfe" <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com> wrote on 20/11/
>> > 201816:44:07:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > From: "Thomas Stüfe" <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>
>> > > > > > > > > Cc: Java Core Libs <core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>> > > > > > > > > Date: 20/11/2018 16:48
>> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8214063: OpenJDK will not build
>> > on AIX while
>> > > > > > > > > using the xlc 13.1 compiler
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 5:12 PM Adam Farley8
>> > > > > > <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Hi Tom,
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Sounds reasonable. I've added a webex to the bug, and here's a
>> > > > > > > > > link to the bug.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D8214063&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
>> > > > > > > > > siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> > CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=z8YYwBXEfN7UtX1suPjpp9CZSHf8v0GrIMK3XGIC9VY&s=81TP9mIjhYD2Hmt8g7p2EHWRZXgiep21hxKLYRU7zIQ&e=
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > This patch is required because otherwise, when building on AIX
>> > > > > > > > > using xlc 3.1,
>> > > > > > > > > > the build fails with this error:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > "Visibility is not allowed on a reference to an
>> > imported symbol."
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > We believe this is caused by JNIEXPORT and JNIIMPORTnot being
>> > > > > > > > > defined. Without
>> > > > > > > > > > this, almost no symbols are exported from shared libraries
>> > > > > > due to use of
>> > > > > > > > > > -qvisibility=hidden as specified in make/lib/LibCommon.gmk.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Yes but what I try to understand is why does this
>> > happen now with
>> > > > > > > > > xlc13? Did xlc change the rules for -qvisibility from
>> > v12 to v13 ?
>> > > > > > > > > That would be quite a break in backward compatibility.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > For convenience, here's a summary of the diffs:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------
>> > > > > > > > > > File 1 of 2) src/java.base/share/native/libjimage/
>> > > > > > NativeImageBuffer.cpp
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > #include "osSupport.hpp"
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > +#if defined(__xlC__) && (__xlC__ >= 0x0d01)
>> > > > > > > > > > +/*
>> > > > > > > > > > + * Version 13.1.3 of xlc seems to have trouble parsing the
>> > > > > > `__attribute__`
>> > > > > > > > > > + * annotation in the generated header file we're about to
>> > > > > > > > > include. Repeating
>> > > > > > > > > > + * the forward declaration (without the braces) here avoids
>> > > > > > the diagnostic:
>> > > > > > > > > > + * 1540-0040 (S) The text "void" is unexpected.
>> > "visibility"
>> > > > > > > > > may be undeclared or ambiguous.
>> > > > > > > > > > + */
>> > > > > > > > > > +extern "C" JNIEXPORT jobject JNICALL
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > Java_jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer_getNativeMap(JNIEnv *,
>> > > > > > > > > jclass, jstring);
>> > > > > > > > > > +#endif
>> > > > > > > > > > +
>> > > > > > > > > > #include "jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer.h"
>> > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------
>> > > > > > > > > > File 2 of 2) src/java.base/unix/native/include/jni_md.h
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > #define JNIIMPORT __attribute__((visibility
>> > ("default")))
>> > > > > > > > > > #endif
>> > > > > > > > > > +#elif defined(__xlC__) && (__xlC__ >= 0x0d01) /*
>> > xlc version 13.1
>> > > > > > > > > or better required */
>> > > > > > > > > > + #define JNIEXPORT __attribute__((visibility
>> > ("default")))
>> > > > > > > > > > + #define JNIIMPORT __attribute__((visibility
>> > ("default")))
>> > > > > > > > > > #else
>> > > > > > > > > > #define JNIEXPORT
>> > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Thank you.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Cheers, Thomas
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Best Regards
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Adam Farley
>> > > > > > > > > > IBM Runtimes
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > "Thomas Stüfe" <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com> wrote on 19/11/
>> > > > 201818:11:34:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > From: "Thomas Stüfe" <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > > > > > To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>
>> > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Java Core Libs <core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>> > > > > > > > > > > Date: 19/11/2018 18:12
>> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: RFR: JDK-8214063: OpenJDK will not build
>> > > > on AIX while
>> > > > > > > > > > > using the xlc 13.1 compiler
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Adam,
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > could you please include link to the JBS issue and either
>> > > > > > link to the
>> > > > > > > > > > > patch/webrev or link to the webrev, or at the very
>> > > > least the patch
>> > > > > > > > > > > verbatim?
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > As for the issue itself: could you please elaborate why this
>> > > > > > > > > fails with xlc13?
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Also, a real patch would be helpful instead here of
>> > > > yet another link
>> > > > > > > > > > > to some J9 issue. We are really strapped for manpower and
>> > > > > > the AIX port
>> > > > > > > > > > > eats up enough time as it is.
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Thomas
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 6:28 PM Adam Farley8
>> > > > > > > > > <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Both the problem and the solution appear straight-
>> > > > forward enough.
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Details included in the bug description.
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts and opinions welcome.
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Adam Farley
>> > > > > > > > > > > > IBM Runtimes
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Unless stated otherwise above:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and
>> > > > > > Wales with number
>> > > > > > > > > > > > 741598.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
>> > > > > > > > > Hampshire PO6 3AU
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Unless stated otherwise above:
>> > > > > > > > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England
>> > and Wales with
>> > > > > > > > > number 741598.
>> > > > > > > > > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
>> > > > > > Hampshire PO6 3AU
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Unless stated otherwise above:
>> > > > > > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales
>> > > > > > with number 741598.
>> > > > > > > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
>> > > > Hampshire PO6 3AU
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Unless stated otherwise above:
>> > > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
>> > > > number 741598.
>> > > > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
>> > Hampshire PO6 3AU
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Unless stated otherwise above:
>> > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
>> > number 741598.
>> > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>> >
>>
>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
>> number 741598.
>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
>> 3AU
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list