[12] RFR: 8210633: Cannot parse JapaneseDate string with DateTimeFormatterBuilder Mapped-values

Stephen Colebourne scolebourne at joda.org
Tue Sep 25 07:19:29 UTC 2018


Thanks, +1 from me (not an OpenJDK reviewer).
Stephen

On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 21:40, Naoto Sato <naoto.sato at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
> On 9/22/18 11:57 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > The change seems simple enough.
> > Does the test prove the change though? I thought the issue was with
> > months, not years?
>
> The jira issue refers to both. Added the month-of-year map testing as well:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8210633/webrev.01/
>
> In fact, the submitter is trying to use this mapping for "Gannen" (first
> year of the era) support for the upcoming Japanese new era (May/2019),
> where formatting the first year would result in "元年". Currently,
> j.t.SimpleDateFormat can display this with 'y' pattern, as it is
> calendar specific [1], DateTimeFormatter's 'y' is for digits only.
>
> Naoto
>
> [1]
> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/10/docs/api/java/text/SimpleDateFormat.html#year
>
> > Stephen
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 22:32, Naoto Sato <naoto.sato at oracle.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Please review the fix to the following issue:
> >>
> >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210633
> >>
> >> The proposed changeset is located at:
> >>
> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8210633/webrev.00/
> >>
> >> As the submitter pointed out, the overload method that takes Chronology
> >> needs to be overridden in the anonymous DateTimeTextProvider class.
> >>
> >> Naoto


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list