RFR: JDK-8233591: Reorder jpackage help text to focus on package

[Alexey Semenyuk]

Kevin,

My point was to add consistency. We used to have class names in camel 
case and pascal case (className, ClassName) and this didn't look right 
for me. I agree ClassName, `mypkg` is more appropriate. I'm neutral 
about myJar.jar and MyJar.jar.

- Alexey

On 11/9/2019 12:37 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> I disagree with a couple of these changes, but they can be fixed in a 
> subsequent pass, since you've already pushed the changes.
>
> By convention, class names are camel case with leading upper-case 
> letter, so ClassName expresses that better than className. Similarly, 
> MyJar.jar seems better to me than myJar.jar. By convention, package 
> names don't have upper-case letters at all, so package.name or `mypkg` 
> might be better than packageName.
>
> -- Kevin
>
> On 11/9/2019 2:50 AM, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
>> Looks good.
>>
>> - Alexey
>>
>> On 11/8/2019 4:31 PM, Andy Herrick wrote:
>>> revised [3] as per below suggestions.
>>>
>>> [3] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~herrick/8233591/webrev.03
>>>
>>> /Andy
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/8/2019 4:07 PM, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
>>>> This is minor and not directly related to this change, but looks 
>>>> like we have inconsistency in names in Sample usages.
>>>> Names used: modulePath, ModulePath, moduleName, className, 
>>>> moduleName/ClassName, moduleName/className, package.ClassName, 
>>>> inputdir, MyJar.jar, appRuntimeImage, name, <app image dir>.
>>>> I'd suggest the following changes if we are touching this section 
>>>> of help anyways:
>>>> package.ClassName -> packageName.className
>>>> MyJar.jar -> myJar.jar
>>>> inputdir -> inputDir
>>>> ModulePath -> modulePath
>>>> moduleName/ClassName -> moduleName/className
>>>> <app image dir> -> appImageDir
>>>>
>>>> - Alexey
>>>>
>>>> On 11/8/2019 3:41 PM, Andy Herrick wrote:
>>>>> Please review the revised jpackage fix for bug [1] at [2].
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a fix for the JDK-8200758-branch branch of the open 
>>>>> sandbox repository (jpackage).
>>>>>
>>>>> This fix (webrev.02) was revised after feedback from webrev.01.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233591
>>>>>
>>>>> [2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~herrick/8233591/webrev.02/
>>>>>
>>>>> /Andy
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>